Readit News logoReadit News
hundchenkatze commented on GitHub is no longer independent at Microsoft after CEO resignation   theverge.com/news/757461/... · Posted by u/Handy-Man
catigula · a month ago
The null hypothesis is that Apple chips aren't better. You simply assumed they were into evidence. It's up to you to provide the figures that they are.

Of course, they really aren't, which is pretty obvious. It doesn't make sense that Apple would randomly invent some categorically new CPU technology when they don't even own an instruction set or foundry and that they would simply be concocting some vendor lock-in supply chain scheme.

hundchenkatze · a month ago
> Because I have performance/tdp numbers

It sounds like you've already done the work... why not just share the numbers. I'm just asking to see what you claim to have. Unless... you don't have them and you're just making stuff up.

hundchenkatze commented on GitHub is no longer independent at Microsoft after CEO resignation   theverge.com/news/757461/... · Posted by u/Handy-Man
catigula · a month ago
What is the efficiency loss specifically? Do you even know, or are you just asserting it?

>it doesn't matter because the ARM transition is essentially already done

'Essentially' is doing a lot of heavy-lifting here, but, putting that aside, A. you're wrong, I've recently ran into Rosetta throttling and B. it's not a good reason to begin the project at all, it's only a good reason when it's already done. You're essentially ceding "Yes, I've been wrong and this has been a fool's errand for the past x years until right this moment as the project is done". It's not done and it'd a weak argument.

>Aside from superior performance and battery life (even compared to ARM windows offerings), the M series devices are generally reliable, unlike windows laptops running Intel and (less so) AMD.

Specifically what are the numbers? Because I have performance/tdp numbers and the M-series performs well but it isn't a categorical difference. In fact, that's no difference, it performs okay but AMD is at the top of the heap currently. Sad.

hundchenkatze · a month ago
then post the numbers? You're just here doing the same thing, asserting that the efficiency is bad, only using more words.

Performance and efficiency has been great for me. I've never run into rosetta throttling. I've got the numbers - trust me bro.

hundchenkatze commented on uBlock Origin Lite now available for Safari   apps.apple.com/app/ublock... · Posted by u/Jiahang
LeoPanthera · a month ago
Used to be Russian. The company moved to Cyprus.

Most of their software (including AdGuard for Safari and AdGuard Home) is open source, so there's little chance of anything nefarious happening.

hundchenkatze · a month ago
Except there's no easy way to verify that what you get from the store has been built, unmodified, from the public source - afaik.

(I still use AdGuard fwiw)

hundchenkatze commented on Perplexity is using stealth, undeclared crawlers to evade no-crawl directives   blog.cloudflare.com/perpl... · Posted by u/rrampage
Izkda · a month ago
> If the user asks about a particular page and Perplexity fetches only that page, then robots.txt has nothing to say about this and Perplexity shouldn’t even consider it

That's not what Perplexity own documentation[1] says though:

"Webmasters can use the following robots.txt tags to manage how their sites and content interact with Perplexity

Perplexity-User supports user actions within Perplexity. When users ask Perplexity a question, it might visit a web page to help provide an accurate answer and include a link to the page in its response. Perplexity-User controls which sites these user requests can access. It is not used for web crawling or to collect content for training AI foundation models."

[1] https://docs.perplexity.ai/guides/bots

hundchenkatze · a month ago
You left out the part that says Perplexity-User generally ignores robots.txt because it's used for user requested actions.

> Since a user requested the fetch, this fetcher generally ignores robots.txt rules.

hundchenkatze commented on Perplexity is using stealth, undeclared crawlers to evade no-crawl directives   blog.cloudflare.com/perpl... · Posted by u/rrampage
catlifeonmars · a month ago
I don’t disagree with you about robots.txt… however, what _is_ the right tool for the job?
hundchenkatze · a month ago
auth, If you don't want content to be publicly accessible, don't make it public.
hundchenkatze commented on Sign in with Google in Chrome   underpassapp.com/news/202... · Posted by u/frizlab
breadwinner · a month ago
You can create multiple profiles in Chrome. You shouldn't sign into Google in your main profile. That should be reserved for just one profile reserved for Gmail.
hundchenkatze · a month ago
Yes blame the victim
hundchenkatze commented on How to Firefox   kau.sh/blog/how-to-firefo... · Posted by u/Vinnl
ripe · 2 months ago
Your browsing infrastructure seems intriguing. Do you have it written up somewhere, so others could try reproducing?
hundchenkatze · a month ago
Don't bother, I tried asking the same, only to have web browsing mansplained to me in such a generic way that could apply to using a regular browser.
hundchenkatze commented on How to Firefox   kau.sh/blog/how-to-firefo... · Posted by u/Vinnl
1vuio0pswjnm7 · a month ago
Basic setup:

DNS data gathered in bulk

HTTP generator

TCP client

Authoritative DNS server

TLS forward proxy

HTML reader

How I access the web:

I pay for an internet subscription and send HTTP requests to ports 80 or 443 at the IP addresses of other networked computers.

hundchenkatze · a month ago
ok, from this response I can only assume you use FF/Safari/Chrome/etc... you've just described how the web/browsers/ISPs work.

My browser does all these things too. You initially made a point to imply that you were doing something different than the average person.

I was more interested in the specific tools you use. Sorry I wasn't excruciatingly specific in my question, I forgot what site I was on.

hundchenkatze commented on How to Firefox   kau.sh/blog/how-to-firefo... · Posted by u/Vinnl
1vuio0pswjnm7 · 2 months ago
Having tested uMatrix and uBlock Origin for years, and having tried many other Firefox extensions, IMO the best Firefox advantage is neither of those nor any other extension. It is a rarely discussed about:config option called

network.dns.forceResolve

Chrome desktop also has something like this, but it's a command-line option. Firefox OTOH allows one to select a global domain-to-IP mapping while the browser is running.

uMatrix and uBlock are IMHO designed for graphical browsers and the graphical www. For me, graphics are secondary, not a priority. I can get better (easier) control over HTTP requests and real-time transparency into TLS traffic through a forward proxy.

Firefox is still massive overkill for me. Ridiculously large and complicated. No doubt there are people who are comfortable and pleased with this sort of complexity. Glad they like it, but I am not one of those people.

Unlike Chromium or Firefox the relatively small and simple software I use to extract information from the web can be compiled in seconds on inexpensive hardware. The speeds of "no-browser" (HTTP generator plus TCP client) or the text-only browser I use easily beat any graphical, Javascript-running browser. Better control over HTTP headers, cookies and real-time, configurable logging. Not only that but I can process large, catenated HTML files that make the complex, popular browsers stall and choke.

If the goal is to achieve some customised graphical representation of a complex website, I think uBlock Origin and uMatrix are unmatched. But if the goal is "blocking", i.e., only making the HTTP requests that the user intends, and controlling the content of those requests, without regard for graphics, then I think I do better with the foward proxy.

hundchenkatze · 2 months ago
I'd love to hear more about your setup, and how you access the web.
hundchenkatze commented on XMLUI   blog.jonudell.net/2025/07... · Posted by u/mpweiher
madeofpalk · 2 months ago
The funny thing about this - and I don't know whether this is as good or a bad thing - is that you could probably almost implement this XMLUI entirely in React/JSX.

Glancing over the markup, none of this seems too alien to React.

This all seems not too dissimilar to the generic pages-as-JSON DSL that every CMS/developer reinvents every other project.

hundchenkatze · 2 months ago
It is implemented using React.

> XMLUI wraps React and CSS and provides a suite of components that you compose with XML markup.

u/hundchenkatze

KarmaCake day866December 11, 2011View Original