I wonder how it’s different from using playwright MCP? The prompts and screenshots, I guess?
Readit Newshelsinki commented on Claude for Chrome anthropic.com/news/claude... · Posted by u/davidbarker
“will transfirm you from being a consumer to a producer”
You mean, “will teach you to make REST calls instead of letting a script do it for you”.
We are all consumers. Unless, of course, you work at one of three companies.
helsinki commented on Claude Code IDE integration for Emacs github.com/manzaltu/claud... · Posted by u/kgwgk
I just like having a neovim terminal open with claude code open
I think that’s a decent approach, but doesn’t the performance of a Neovim terminal bother you? It simply does not feel as good as a native terminal pane. It’s not as bad as VSCode’s terminal pane, but it still leaves something to be desired.
helsinki commented on Claude Code IDE integration for Emacs github.com/manzaltu/claud... · Posted by u/kgwgk
Pretty cool! I love that these battle proven editors (emacs and (n)vim) seem to follow along with new technology, even though one might think overwise given their age.
I hope this comes to vim as well!
It’s more common that they lead technological advancements in IDEs, not follow. Neovim in particular.
Trash
helsinki commented on Show HN: Vibe Kanban – Kanban board to manage your AI coding agents github.com/BloopAI/vibe-k... · Posted by u/louiskw
> Maybe it's my fault, but i tried every single coding agent with a variety of similar tools and whenever i try to parallelize, they clash while editing files simultaneously, i lose mental context of what's going on, they rewrite tests etc.
Fwiw Claude suggests using different git workspaces for your agents. This would entirely solve the clashing, though they may still conflict and need normal git conflict resolves of course.
Theoretically that would work fine, as it would be just like two people working on different branches/repos/etc.
I've not tried that though. AI generates way too much code for me to review as it is, several subtasks working concurrently would be overwhelming for me.
This works in theory and somewhat in practice but it is not as clean as people make it seem, as someone who has spent tens of thousands on Opus tokens and worktrees - it’s just not that great. It works, but it’s just, ugh, boring, super tedious, etc. at the end of it all, you’re still sitting around waiting for Claude to merge conflicts.
helsinki commented on Show HN: Vibe Kanban – Kanban board to manage your AI coding agents github.com/BloopAI/vibe-k... · Posted by u/louiskw
So far, it’s relatively bug-free well-written code that I’ve forked to work behind the walls of a hedge fund, and it works, but the reality is that it doesn’t provide anything that some terminal windows and git worktrees can’t offer. Am I missing something?
You really need to add more features, because I struggle to find a compelling reason for advanced users to use it.
helsinki commented on Launch HN: Morph (YC S23) – Apply AI code edits at 4,500 tokens/sec · Posted by u/bhaktatejas922
Genuine: how? I assume you're using something like cc-usage to get that value. $1k/day is tons. Would genuinely love to know how you're managing to keep the inference burning through that much a day, as I'd love to do the same, but even with 2-4 simultaneous sessions running fairly continuously, mostly on Opus for 10-12 hours a day, I get maybe $500/day. What's your workflow rig/setup look like to get you to that $1k velocity?
I use Vertex and work at a hedge fund. I just spam Claude Code Opus all day long. There’s not much to it, other than I sit at a chair for 12-16 hours and spam poor (actually, rich) Claude. I don’t use the cc usage too - I just look at my GCP bill :(
helsinki commented on Why LLMs Can't Write Q/Kdb+: Writing Code Right-to-Left medium.com/@gabiteodoru/w... · Posted by u/gabiteodoru
My curmudgeonly genius Q/Kdb+ programmer of a co-worker, whom claims to be immune to the impact of LLMs, is going to be fucking pissed when he hears about Qython.