The (current) last commend by hakavlad (same as hakavlad on HN perhaps?):
@HACKERALERT Your decision may be somewhat irresponsible towards those who donated to the audit.
That audit was one year ago. The money didn't go towards the author. The source continues to be available. The author doesn't own you zilch.>The money didn't go towards the author.
Perhaps many would have refused to donate if they knew that the project would be archived in a year. Collecting for audit and then archiving the project is, in a way, a violation of expectations.
The more and more you start modifying code after the audit, the more and more useless the audit becomes.