I'll make another bold prediction. This is Trump huffpuff and Twitter won't be going anywhere.
You can continue to believe Trump is unpredictable when almost everything he does is signaled far in advance.
I'll make another bold prediction. This is Trump huffpuff and Twitter won't be going anywhere.
You can continue to believe Trump is unpredictable when almost everything he does is signaled far in advance.
Now if getting involved is smart from a business perspective is another question. But but they will have thought about that and also considered the consequences of not acting.
So he can have HQ in a cheap country, but pay SV salaries to the now remote workers in SV? Does not make much sense to me.
(Sure, HN's leaky "no politics" rule, but ultimately you can refuse to deal with politics only so long as politics refuses to deal with you. It will be interesting to see what the effect of the Section 230 executive order will be... which also got flagged off HN)
And it's not so much a refusal to deal with politics as much as we are already dealing with it everywhere else. It's nice to have a refuge. Although I find it strange that thread was pruned as Section 230 is definitely related to tech.
My best guess is that Jack plans to move the company headquarters out of the US which would explain why he chose to allow remote work indefinitely. But can he get it past shareholders? The President had also stated he doesn't want foreign companies on the NYSE and no other market offers similar liquidity.
Apple does this with the App Store, where it is possible to get away with breaking app store rules if the app is not downloaded very often. It is not worth the time and energy for Apple to challenge apps that no one is downloading in the first place.
On twitter, with regard to illegal content it also has to matter the degree. How illegal / and reprehensible is it? How often is this tweet being requested?
That is literally the law of the land. Read into castle doctrine and duty to retreat. Business owners have the legal right to defend their life on their property with deadly force if left no choice (i.e. a mob has surrounded you)
At any rate his tweet was ambiguous, he could have meant shooting naturally follows looting, not that he was ordering the guard to execute civilians.