Readit NewsIt's pretty difficult and expensive to build one stack, let alone three and onboard another tool.
> What we have here is a Rube Goldberg machine, not a cleanly solved engineering problem.
And what _we_ have here is unfounded indignation over a perfectly fine way to solve a problem. People have been using linked libraries to re-use code across languages since forever, it's fine. This solution isn't very different, it just makes shipping easier.
As a parting comment, "sound software architecture" is not a decided upon principle which can be empirically determined, and if it was we'd all be out of a job.
Absolutely no way is this a fine way to solve the problem. That is crazy talk.
1. It introduces additional toolchains into the solution when it is unnecessary.
2. It now means you need multiple language specialists to maintain it and associated communications and context switching.
3. More interfaces and integration means more fragility when it comes to debugging, problem solving as well as increasing the problem surface.
4. It massively increases the dependency stack which means there are now multiple sets of supply chain issues and patching required.
This makes no problems easier at all! It's even a bad last resort if that's all you have left to try.
Sound software architecture is very very well defined and this is definitely not it. I have seen entire companies burn by taking this approach to problem solving.
I'm really getting tired of solutions before problems and this is a fundamental example of it. Give us a real use case not manufacture a problem for it.
How can we fight it as consumers?
Getting a few dollars here and there from a personal site's ads feels cheap and detracts from the article. Tip jar, fine. But ads no. It just feels dirty. Even if they are "ethical".
From my perspective (as an employer) I see this stuff and think holy hell they'll want to stick advertising on everything. Turns me right off.
Shuffling music, turning lights on, yes fine - because confirmation that the right thing has happened is instant and effortless. Anything else, I'll use a button or a screen.
Confirmation is required when dealing with humans as well ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11fCIGcCa9c (this reminds me of Alexa)
"Hey Google, put dishwasher salt on the shopping list" "OK, I added 'put dishwasher salt'" (strangely, this particular bug only manifests for dishwasher salt).
Timers are useful, but sometimes they can't be shut off by voice command.
This is the main reason why I have an Echo in my bathroom! The one advantage Alexa has over everything else is that you can voice shop -- "alexa buy more toilet paper" solves the problem that much faster than a reminder for later.
The reason Alexa exists is to sell you Amazon's prices, not necessarily a good deal.
"Hey Siri, add more toilet paper to the shopping list" (while pooping)
"Hey Siri, shuffle my music" (while driving)
"Hey Siri, countdown 10 minutes" (while shoving a pizza in the oven)
Anything else is a shit show. Anything where trust or accuracy is involved i.e. mutating data, spending money, absolutely no way can I trust it at all and never will.