Readit News logoReadit News
gtmitchell commented on Scientific fraud has become an 'industry,' analysis finds   science.org/content/artic... · Posted by u/pseudolus
gtmitchell · 7 months ago
Unsurprising. It's the natural byproduct of overproduction of scientists, brutally competitive job markets, and the shortsighted decisions to use publications as the primary metric for hiring and promotion decisions.

Anyone who is alarmed by this hasn't been paying attention to the perverse incentives scientists have been facing for decades.

gtmitchell commented on Ask HN: What is your fallback job if AI takes away your career?    · Posted by u/7402
gtmitchell · 9 months ago
Hopefully I can move back into the laboratory. I'm a scientist who moved into lab software admin a few years ago, and there are days I miss it a lot.
gtmitchell commented on The Illustrated Guide to a PhD   matt.might.net/articles/p... · Posted by u/chii
mattmight · a year ago
Original author of the guide here. Wonderful to see these little illustrations still making the rounds. I first published them in 2010!

To those in the comments who mentioned you are just starting your own PhD: Good luck to you! And, I hope you, like I once did, find a problem that you can fall in love with for a few years.

To those just finished: Congratulations! Don’t forget to keep pushing!

To those many years out: You have to keep pushing too, but there can be tremendous value in starting all over again by pushing in a different direction. You have no idea what you may find between the tips of two fields.

gtmitchell · a year ago
Any advice for PhD dropouts? I spent years and years pushing against that boundary in an obscure corner of my field and it never moved. What little funding I had dried up and I left grad school with a half finished dissertation, no PhD, and giant pile of broken dreams.

I'm sure over the years you've known students who have started a PhD and not finished. What (if anything) have you said to them? Do you feel their efforts had any value?

gtmitchell commented on The Illustrated Guide to a PhD   matt.might.net/articles/p... · Posted by u/chii
worldmerge · a year ago
Is it possible to be a professor without a PhD? I would like to teach at a college level but the PhD path seems so risky to me to take a pay cut for years and you might not get the degree, and not a get a job.
gtmitchell · a year ago
In the US at least, it is entirely possible to teach at a university without a PhD. Community colleges are full of instructors with masters's degrees, and tons of classes offered by major universities are taught by graduate students or adjunct faculty without doctorates.

Your job title probably won't be 'professor', but you'll be doing basically the same work as one.

gtmitchell commented on An academic Great Gatsby Curve – How much academic success is inherited?   blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofs... · Posted by u/nabla9
gtmitchell · a year ago
I think this result is obvious to anyone who has spent any time in the academic world, although it is nice to see some solid numbers behind it.

The harsh truth is that key to academic career advancement is who you know much more than what you know. I every single person I knew in graduate school who got a postdoc position did so through informal means (i.e. knowing someone who knew someone), and having letters of recommendation written by the right people from the right departments at the right schools opens all sorts of doors to the academic hierarchy that would otherwise be closed.

gtmitchell commented on Things I Won't Work With: Dimethylcadmium (2013)   science.org/content/blog-... · Posted by u/Bluestein
cperciva · 2 years ago
[I]ts odor is variously described as "foul", "unpleasant", "metallic", "disagreeable", and (wait for it) "characteristic", which is an adjective that shows up often in the literature with regard to smells, and almost always makes a person want to punch whoever thought it was useful.

No need to punch them; if someone has been exposed to enough dimethylcadmium to describe its odor as "characteristic" they probably don't have long to live...

gtmitchell · 2 years ago
A generation ago or two ago, it was common for chemists to use taste and smell as a tools for qualitative evaluation of chemical compounds.

So older scientific literature is full of all sorts of knowledge that was obtained in ways that are shockingly unsafe by modern standards, including gems like the taste of all sorts of poisons and how large quantities of plutonium are warm to the touch.

gtmitchell commented on Parasites are everywhere. Why do so few researchers study them?   smithsonianmag.com/scienc... · Posted by u/sohkamyung
gtmitchell · 2 years ago
I immediately Ctrl-F'd for 'funding'. There's your problem right there. If there's no money to support graduate students, you're never going to get enough researchers to replace the ones you have.

Additionally, graduate students tend to avoid selecting research areas they dislike or find disgusting. The most disturbing presentation I've ever watched was a slideshow given by a parasitologist in which I saw worms in parts of the human body I never imagined it possible for worms to be in. No wonder students aren't lining up to spend years of their life working with them.

gtmitchell commented on How I got my laser eye injury   funraniumlabs.com/2024/07... · Posted by u/omnibrain
gtmitchell · 2 years ago
That brings back memories. One of my first research projects in school was doing sketchy things with a Quanta-Ray Nd:YAG laser. I remember the distinct 'tack-tack-tack' sound of the Q-switching at 10 Hz which I used to create a laser-induced plasma right around eye level.

Fortunately I had the proper goggles on but was always terrified of catching a stray reflection and blinding myself. Now we live in a world of dirt-cheap high-powered diode lasers, and when I see all the stupid things YouTubers do with them with almost no discussion of proper eye safety, I wince.

gtmitchell commented on You got a null result. Will anyone publish it?   nature.com/articles/d4158... · Posted by u/sohkamyung
gtmitchell · 2 years ago
As someone whose early scientific career was destroyed by null results, no. No one will publish your negative results. Unless you win the lottery and stumble across a once-in-a-generation negative result (e.g. the Michelson–Morley experiment), any time you spend working on research that yields negative results is essentially wasted.

This article completely glosses over the fact that to publish a typical negative result, you need to have progressed your scientific career to the point where you are able to do so. To get there, you need piles of publications, and since publishing positive results is vastly easier than publishing negative ones, everyone is incentivized to not waste time on the negative ones. You either publish or you perish, after all.

Simply put, within the current framework of how people actually become scientists and do research, there is no way to solve the 'file drawer' problem. You might see an occasional graduate student find something unusual enough to publish, or an already-tenured professor with enough freedom to spend the time submitting their manuscript to 20 different journals, but the vast majority of scientists are going to drop any research avenue that doesn't immediately yield positive results.

gtmitchell commented on Ask HN: What's the worst advice you've ever received?    · Posted by u/surprisetalk
gtmitchell · 2 years ago
"Just be yourself". Such terrible, useless advice to give to someone who is struggling with dating.

u/gtmitchell

KarmaCake day467November 9, 2015View Original