Readit News logoReadit News
gsatic commented on Money is pouring into AI. Skeptics say it’s a ‘grift shift’   institutionalinvestor.com... · Posted by u/flarecoder
kubb · 3 years ago
Modern "economy".

There are a bunch of thousands of guys with a couple to a couple hundred billion each. There are millions of people desperate to own a house and afford life. The rich guys want to be more rich. They're hiring some of the poor suckers to check how others got richer in the past. The answer is tech!

New tech is created every couple of years. People hype it up as much as they can. The rich guys give a fraction of their billions each to finance whatever seems remotely reasonable while squinting in that space, just for a chance to hit the jackpot and get more billions, maybe even a trillion, and their face onto Forbes and on TV.

The poor suckers gotta scramble. They invent all kinds of bullshit, and they sell it to the other poor suckers who advise the rich guys. Teams of specialists are created. Whole organizations. There's HR, somebody to organize team building events. Every layer spawns another layer. Lawyers, somebody to give sexual harassment trainings, someone to run the cafeteria.

Buildings are rented from the rich guys via managment companies run by the poor suckers. Every day a handful of people make it and can even buy a house! Codes of conduct are written, company values and mission statements. People pivot, jump from place to place, try to sign the best contract. Every once in a while an exec jumps ship with several hundred mil in the bank.

It's a great life. What could be better?

gsatic · 3 years ago
Things are always changing.

The US and its mindless dynamics definately could use a kick in the teeth to speed up the change. But its happening with interest rates rising, dedollarization etc. Some rich folk who think nothing is changing and their behavior doesnt need to change, their story wont end well.

They dont have as much control over anything as they think. In fact I think rich people are going to take the biggest hit mentally, financially, socially cause its very precarious having wealth without control over what happens tomorrow morning.

gsatic commented on The End of the Googleverse   theverge.com/23846048/goo... · Posted by u/CharlesW
hedora · 3 years ago
Content targeted / display ads would fix this. By design, they pay sites a premium for quality content, unlike user targeting which pays for quality eyeballs.

If user targeting were banned, we’d be back to economic incentives for content creators that are similar to pre-internet media and publishing.

In particular, you’d be paid for having a consistent measurable audience, which means the money would go to distribution channels that had high quality editors and curation. Today’s ad netwoks funnel that money to clickbait farms.

gsatic · 3 years ago
Only partly cuz Content is easy to copy and duplicate and rebroadcast. All of which the platforms have made free and easy. That has to be addressed.

Cuz One journo surfaces info. 6000 journos copy it and broadcast it and all expect to paid.

The solutions have to built around content reduction cuz right now we are over loaded with millions of people creating nothing new and expecting to be rewarded.

gsatic commented on The End of the Googleverse   theverge.com/23846048/goo... · Posted by u/CharlesW
smogcutter · 3 years ago
The problem is that the internet we remember from when google was good no longer exists. Blogs are dead. Personal websites are dead. Noncommercial, informational or niche interest websites are dead. Search sucks primarily because there’s nothing worth searching for anymore.

Yes, we can most of us name real websites that we still read & rely on. When did those sites start publishing? How many of the creator-controlled, non-commercial websites/blogs you read began less than say 5 years ago? I bet the number rounds down to 0.

Google search sure as hell played their part in creating this world, but fixing search isn’t going to bring back an internet worth searching.

gsatic · 3 years ago
Google was supposed to solve the info overload problem that growing networks produce.

Instead they focused on growing the network and making content creation and broadcast of content free.

So today less than .5% of content produced is consumed according to the UN report on the attention economy.

Whats the fix? Content production needs to be scaled down. A better system is required that decides Who gets to broadcast, how much and when. Bandwith Advertising consumes within such a system must have a cap. Now there is no cap. Ads can be shown on everywhere and all the time. "Scaling things up" should be a political/social decision not a business/technical decision.

The focus must be brought back to solving info overload.

gsatic commented on Drawings of the Taj Mahal and Agra monument from the early 19th century   blogs.bl.uk/asian-and-afr... · Posted by u/prismatic
gsatic · 3 years ago
Interview question I got once - The Taj Mahal took 27 years to build, if you could work on something for 27 years what would you pick?
gsatic commented on N guilty men (1997)   www2.law.ucla.edu/volokh/... · Posted by u/emmelaich
bArray · 3 years ago
> The story is told of a Chinese law professor, who was listening to a British lawyer explain that Britons were so enlightened, they believed it was better that ninety-nine guilty men go free than that one innocent man be executed. The Chinese professor thought for a second and asked, "Better for whom?"

Specially referring to the British legal system (although others will apply), the system itself is part of the punishment, and is often used maliciously as so. You can be accused of X, have your details leaked to the press (by the police!), have social judgement cast upon you, only to be quietly found innocent later.

From personal experience: Better yet, you can have the police abuse their power to seize property and raid your home during the early hours of the morning, only to have all charges dropped, in which case you have to go through a lengthy process to get your (now damaged) items back. There is zero recourse, all of the oversight bodies are filled with ex-police and look after their own.

Meanwhile the real guilty people are 'let off' (non-pursued) because they flee the jurisdiction of the local police, or are part of a community the police are scared of. They only care for easy quick wins.

To address the article directly, the current system is to let 10 guilty men escape justice, whilst harassing 10 innocent men, and occasionally prosecuting them too.

gsatic · 3 years ago
Its pretty much how any org/institution that deals with a little too much day to day unpredictability and randomness functions.

They learn quickly that lot of the problems they have to solve dont have solutions and are above their resource/skill level. So the goals turn defensive. Dont get blamed. Avoid the hard/unpredictable and complex. Survive long enough to collect pension and become a netflix advisor.

No one with a choice wants these jobs.

gsatic commented on Ask HN: What should be the minimum wage in the Bay Area for affordable housing?    · Posted by u/julienreszka
gsatic · 3 years ago
The fix is to make monthly rent = monthly mortgage payments (which ever is less) when ever and where ever there is a mismatch.
gsatic commented on Novak Djokovic credits the TaoPatch for his success: What does the science say?   sciencebasedmedicine.org/... · Posted by u/austinallegro
raverbashing · 3 years ago
If Djokovic believes in it I already know it's some woo crap made for people with too much money that gets easily impressed

> This was an uncontrolled study that concluded that wearing the patch improved grip strength and squat jump.

It's even more ridiculous when you see the size of it and how does it attach to the body

gsatic · 3 years ago
With this stuff everything boils down to how you answer a simple question (which usually most people hardly think about or are encouraged to think about) which is - Do you know how to produce Faith?

In yourself (or others). Faith that you can do things, no one including yourself thinks you can.

If you sit down and think about that question, and spend time experimenting with different answers, what you will come up with, wont be too different from what all the religions of the world or djoko comes up with to generate Faith. Which is stories. myths. imagery. rituals etc. The more faith you need to generate the more absurd the methods can look to an external observer. But what matters is not the absurdity (especially if its not hurting anyone else) but whether the methods have caused your Faith gauge to see an uptick.

So go try and see what you come up for yourself or for someone else, next time there is a big challenge ahead. It will help you understand what you see others trying to do.

gsatic commented on Sal Khan: How AI could save (not destroy) education [video]   youtube.com/watch?v=hJP5G... · Posted by u/vanilla-almond
dsign · 3 years ago
Jesus, no! Not all of my teachers were great, and most of the knowledge I got, I earned on my own. But they were part of a world that had nothing to do with the world of my parents--my teachers were learned, where my immediate family was not. My teachers were, if nothing else, an example to follow, a light, a guide.

>> No longer will private tutors be restricted to the rich only.

It's not as simple. I've met plenty of poor people who leave well-tutored rich folk to bite the dust, and the other way around too. That's neither here nor there. A kid with all the tutors but with parents or an environment that doesn't favor learning, gets nowhere. That I have seen too, more times than I can count. And, let's face it, we have had the Internet for a few decades now, bursting to the seams with free knowledge. What difference will it make an AI system of dubious trustworthiness?

gsatic · 3 years ago
Just ignore the AI hype herd. People who are pulling predictions out of their ass, have never had to deal day to day with the bugs these systems produce. You will never see a single person who works on production AI(not toy ai or research ai) making predictions cuz they are too busy staring at exploding bug lists.
gsatic commented on Europe is changing social media for the better – the US can do it, too   thehill.com/opinion/techn... · Posted by u/mpweiher
gsatic · 3 years ago
Social medias prime feature is broadcast capability. For free.

In other forms of media (books, newspapers, radio, tv, phones/sms, chat, email) if you try to broadcast your important thoughts to everyone on the planet you get a giant bill.

Speech was free. But Broadcast capability was not.

The unintented main feature of social media is broadcast being free. And the main unanswered question is why should it be free?

If all the neurons in your brain were broadcasting simultaneously to every other neuron the only outcome is seizures.

The EU has not answered this.

It has instead told the platforms they will be held responsible for seizures.

Someone has to come up with better answers about how we all coordinate broadcasting. Otherwise we will keep seeing scary and shocking seizures.

u/gsatic

KarmaCake day903April 10, 2022View Original