Or, you know, they might actually know something about the subject? On a similar note, most physicists don't think particle colliders will cause mini black holes which will swallow the Earth, but the fear gets repeated by non-physicists.
Or, you know, they might actually know something about the subject? On a similar note, most physicists don't think particle colliders will cause mini black holes which will swallow the Earth, but the fear gets repeated by non-physicists.
If a dev wants money for his work, he should license his work as appropriate and demand payments. If a dev releases his work free-as-in-libre and/or free-as-in-beer, they don't get to complain if the donations are "insufficient".
Or to put it another: Of course a company won't pay up if they don't have to.
This guy seems to be considering making his work into a commercial product, so at least he has the correct idea. Speaking objectively I hope it works out for him.
The psychological burden of carrying such an important but relatively unknown project has trapped him in this state of desperation for years now. It's tunnel vision and sunk loss thinking, time to quit.
The rules for the exterior algebra and the fact that this is a functor let you learn a couple simple rules to simplify expressions into a standard form, and then you just apply those rules mechanically and don't have to remember minus signs or what multiplies with what. It becomes a process that requires no thought.
It's sort of like how once you learn how to deal with complex exponentials, you can forget pretty much every rule from trigonometry, making it entirely pointless to memorize those rules.
Loving someone for, e.g., what they believe in, what they stand for, and how they treat people are examples of love that stems from a deeper understanding of a person’s values, habits, and personality than just loving them one-dimensionally for their wealth or a particular thing they’re well known for. I think that’s what they’re getting at.
I find it much simpler to lurk.