Readit News logoReadit News
gqcwwjtg commented on Tesla's Cybertruck is outselling almost every other EV in the US   businessinsider.com/tesla... · Posted by u/jdenquin
fragmede · a year ago
So 5 bits of anecdata, and a unknown number of terminally online TikTok and Instagram addicts, some of whom don't even own one in the first place.
gqcwwjtg · a year ago
As someone who doesn’t own a car, every single time the cyber truck shows up 50-90% of the info is about these issues. Why would you trust individuals who already bought one more than auto reviewers?
gqcwwjtg commented on The Obvious-Once-You-Think-About-It Reason Why Education Cuts Fertility   betonit.ai/p/the-obvious-... · Posted by u/jger15
purplethinking · a year ago
I would say not having kids and then in essence relying on other people's kids for long term care and production of goods and services in retirement is much worse morally. And then there's the whole keeping the species going. If you think humans shouldn't exist then there is no productive discussion I can have with you.
gqcwwjtg · a year ago
Is there any state the world could be in that letting the species cease to exist would be preferable? At all?
gqcwwjtg commented on Building a simple oscillator based Ising machine for research and education   arxiv.org/abs/2410.00523... · Posted by u/rebanevapustus
akomtu · a year ago
A water machine is solving the water equation in real time?
gqcwwjtg · a year ago
Yeah but you can’t adjust coupling constants so it’s not as generically useful.
gqcwwjtg commented on The Obvious-Once-You-Think-About-It Reason Why Education Cuts Fertility   betonit.ai/p/the-obvious-... · Posted by u/jger15
purplethinking · a year ago
My kids seem to enjoy existing, as do I

What you're saying is, there is no morally defensible reason to have kids, and the human species should just seize to exist for this reason

gqcwwjtg · a year ago
Lucky you! I hope your kids are also as lucky as they age.

The point seems to be that it’s extremely risky. Your decision to have kids outweighs, in the long run, most any other moral decision you make.

gqcwwjtg commented on Writes and Write-Nots   paulgraham.com/writes.htm... · Posted by u/baxtr
amenhotep · a year ago
The author: A requires B

You: what nonsense. Clearly, B does not necessarily require A, and yet he says it does, how poorly argued.

gqcwwjtg · a year ago
Yup, as long as you ignore this quote “If you're thinking without writing, you only think you're thinking.”
gqcwwjtg commented on Microsoft fires employees who organized vigil for Palestinians killed in Gaza   msn.com/en-us/news/world/... · Posted by u/wannacboatmovie
wefewhf · a year ago
Both Dick Cheney and Bill Gates endorse the Democrats, who (by their actions) endorse the current events.
gqcwwjtg · a year ago
There’s not really anyone to endorse that doesn’t support it.
gqcwwjtg commented on Blocking code is a leaky abstraction   notgull.net/blocking-leak... · Posted by u/zdw
accelbred · a year ago
I have the opposite experience, working in embedded (C, not Rust...). Building a synchronous API on top of an async one is hell, and making a blocking API asynchronous is easy.

If you want blocking code to run asynchronously, just run it on another task. I can write an api that queues up the action for the other thread to take, and some functions to check current state. Its easy.

To build a blocking API on top of an async one, I now need a lot of cross thread synchronization. For example, nimBLE provides an async bluetooth interface, but I needed a sync one. I ended up having my API calls block waiting for a series of FreeRTOS task notifications from the code executing asynchronously in nimBLE's bluetooth task. This was a mess of thousands of lines of BLE handling code that involved messaging between the threads. Each error condition needed to be manually verified that it sends an error notification. If a later step does not execute, either through library bug or us missing an error condition, then we are deadlocked. If the main thread continues because we expect no more async work but one of the async functions are called, we will be accessing invalid memory, causing who knows what to happen, and maybe corrupting the other task's stack. If any notification sending point is missed in the code, we deadlock.

gqcwwjtg · a year ago
To build a blocking API on an asynchronous API you make a place for the result to go, start the async API, then poll on the result appearing. Right?
gqcwwjtg commented on Sabotage evaluations for frontier models   anthropic.com/research/sa... · Posted by u/elsewhen
efitz · a year ago
These are interesting tests but my question is, why are we doing them?

LLM models are not “intelligent” by any meaningful measurement- they are not sapient/sentient/conscious/self-aware. They have no “intent” other than what was introduced to them via the system prompt. They cannot reason [1].

Are researchers worried about sapience/consciousness as an emergent property?

Humans who are not AI researchers generally do not have good intuition or judgment about what these systems can do and how they will “fail” (perform other than as intended). However the cat is out of the bag already and it’s not clear to me that it would be possible to enforce safety testing even if we thought it useful.

[1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.05229

gqcwwjtg · a year ago
You don’t need sapience for algorithms to be incentivized to do these things, you only need a minimal amount of self-awareness. If you indicate to an LLM that it wants to accomplish some goal and it’s actions influence when and how it is run in the future, a smart enough LLM would likely be deceptive to keep being run. Self preservation is a convergent instrumental goal.
gqcwwjtg commented on The Shroud of Turin: History and Legends   michaelshermer.substack.c... · Posted by u/royalroad
d_theorist · a year ago
Of course they weren’t dumb, but having a great understanding of shadows is a far cry from being capable of creating a photo negative. They didn’t even have the concept of a photo negative. How would they even have thought to achieve such a thing? And for what purpose?

And, by the way, the image on the shroud is not made of paint, so contemporary proficiency with painting techniques hardly seems relevant.

gqcwwjtg · a year ago
A photo negative in a single color is not a tough concept to stumble upon if you ever carve something to be thin enough to let light through.
gqcwwjtg commented on Helene Should Trigger a National Rethink of Home Insurance   newrepublic.com/article/1... · Posted by u/howard941
nephy · a year ago
I live 2 hours away from the mountains of North Carolina. I grew up in the foothills. You have no idea what you are talking about. People aren’t rebuilding here, “over and over.” This was a climate disaster full stop. If we as a species don’t get our shit together and stop poisoning our planet this will keep happening.
gqcwwjtg · a year ago
No no. If we don’t get our shit together this will get WORSE. If we do get our shit together this will still happen for a long long time.

u/gqcwwjtg

KarmaCake day104October 19, 2018View Original