On one hand I'm sure he will love to see people use their paid Wolfram Language server endpoints coupled to OpenAI's latest juggernaut. On the other, I'm sure he's wondering about what things would have looked like if his company would have been focused on this wave of AI from the start...
For those interested the original Stephen Wolfram post:
https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/01/wolframalpha-as-...
And the release post of their plugin:
https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/03/chatgpt-gets-its...
Surprised they did not include a citation for this research...
Computer text line lengths affect reading and learning
Peter Orton
https://cdn.tc-library.org/Edlab/eye-tracking%20article.pdf
But it seems that Peter Orton has published quite a few works in this area [2], [3]. Specifically [3] seems to note that with a less wide text column width readers are not statistically significant faster (but are a bit), but do see that for difficult reading content, the shorter width requires less re-reading then a wider one along with significantly better retention of the contents of the document.[1] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Reading/Web/Desktop_Improveme...
[2] https://www.scienceopen.com/document_file/671b2d53-73ce-4a91...
[3] https://sci-hub.se/https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007...
Most things you own you also maintain yourself. It doesn’t hold true for software. People expect software to work for some time.. On their new device, after the OS update. Bugs need to be removed, new features built.
You can and will fix your car. You will maintain it too. And you will happily pay for it. Same with the house you own. You might even renovate it, add a new level.
It is not possible to own and maintain software that way.
https://github.com/ratwithacompiler/OBS-captions-plugin
https://obsproject.com/forum/resources/closed-captioning-via...
// ==UserScript==
// @name hacker news favicons
// @match https://news.ycombinator.com/*
// ==/UserScript==
for (let link of document.querySelectorAll('.titlelink')) {
if (link.attributes["hasIcon"] != 'true') {
const domain = new URL(link.href).hostname
const imageUrl = `https://icons.duckduckgo.com/ip3/${domain}.ico`
const image = document.createElement('img')
link.attributes["hasIcon"] = 'true'
image.src = imageUrl
image.width = 16
image.height = 16
image.style.paddingRight = '0.50em'
image.style.paddingLeft = '0.50em'
image.style.verticalAlign = 'middle';
image.style.filter = 'grayscale(1)';
link.prepend(image)
}
}* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31096151
* https://gist.github.com/goldbattle/695f869e43fe8d0e628061cb9...
"* The notice you see about having access to your history and website data is automatically generated because this extension runs on every tab. But it does NOT actually monitor your browsing history or require your personal information to work properly."
The world is correctly nervous about extensions that run on every page.
From a quick look, it seems to just request access to all pages? I am not sure if chrome really has a elegant way to handle per-website requests (as compared to per-tab).
https://robwu.nl/crxviewer/?crx=https%3A%2F%2Fchrome.google....
I think quite a lot of other people have mentioned in the thread that they are getting a lot of other "benefits" from using multiple services, but I don't see how these help solve the problem of data delivery besides taking advantage of the Cloudflare + Backblaze alliance which is $31 if their main website is a static one.