I think AI for science is a good idea in its core, but academia really needs a way to "mark" AI generated papers. Maybe a better application of this would be in ML literature where experiments can be done with something like codex or claude code?
Readit Newsgerroo commented on Nature: AI generated papers are flooding the scientific literature nature.com/articles/d4158... · Posted by u/gerroo
gerroo commented on Show HN: Learn LLMs LeetCode Style github.com/Exorust/TorchL... · Posted by u/Exorust
Cool idea, will try. Since it seems mostly llm generated you could publish the process and prompts for transparency.
Thanks for sharing this :)
Run - if those ‘founders’ keep insisting to revise instead of putting the current MVP in front of users. These kind of founders are useless and you should steer clear of them.
There are no best practices that are universally applicable. Some don’t even like the concept of MVP. But putting a product in front of users - however clunky the product is - is the best practice.
Get early feedback, prioritize, iterate - rinse and repeat. That is all there is to it.
Totally agree! How would you communicate this to the non-technicals in an influential way?
gerroo commented on Show HN: I made a tool to receive alerts when answers change alertfor.com/... · Posted by u/saran945
What did you use to make the demo video?
I built something similar for research papers (https://paperpilot.app). I like how clean the UI is :)
lool I wrote my IB extended essay on this. I had a caesar cipher instead though.