Readit News logoReadit News
georgemcbay commented on The highest quality codebase   gricha.dev/blog/the-highe... · Posted by u/Gricha
FeteCommuniste · 4 days ago
Yeah, I sometimes use AI for questions like "is it possible to do [x] using library [y] and if so, how?" and have received mostly solid answers.
georgemcbay · 4 days ago
> Yeah, I sometimes use AI for questions like "is it possible to do [x] using library [y] and if so, how?" and have received mostly solid answers.

In my experience most LLMs are going to answer this with some form of "Absolutely!" and then propose a square-peg-into-a-round-hole way to do it that is likely suboptimal vs using a different library that is far more suited to your problem if you didn't guess the right fit library to begin with.

The sycophancy problem is still very real even when the topic is entirely technical.

Gemini is (in my experience) the least likely to lead you astray in these situations but its still a significant problem even there.

georgemcbay commented on The "confident idiot" problem: Why AI needs hard rules, not vibe checks   steerlabs.substack.com/p/... · Posted by u/steerlabs
HarHarVeryFunny · 7 days ago
True, although that's a tough call for a company like Google.

Even before LLMs people were asking Google search questions rather than looking for keyword matches, and now coupled with ChatGPT it's not surprising that people are asking the computer to answer questions and seeing this as a replacement for search. I've got to wonder how the typical non-techie user internalizes the difference between asking questions of Google (non-AI mode) and asking ChatGPT?

Clearly people asking ChatGPT instead of Google could rapidly eat Google's lunch, so we're now getting "AI overview" alongside search results as an attempt to mitigate this.

I think the more fundamental problem is not just the blurring of search vs "AI", but these companies pushing "AI" (LLMs) as some kind of super-human intelligence (leading to uses assuming it's logical and infallible), rather than more honestly presenting it as what it is.

georgemcbay · 7 days ago
> Even before LLMs people were asking Google search questions rather than looking for keyword matches

Google gets some of the blame for this by way of how useless Google search became for doing keyword searches over the years. Keyword searches have been terrible for many years, even if you use all the old tricks like quotations and specific operators.

Even if the reason for this is because non-tech people were already trying to use Google in the way that it thinks it optimized for, I'd argue they could have done a better job keeping things working well with keyword searches by training the user with better UI/UX.

(Though at the end of the day, I subscribe to the theory that Google let search get bad for everyone on purpose because once you have monopoly status you show more ads by having a not-great but better-than-nothing search engine than a great one).

georgemcbay commented on Adenosine on the common path of rapid antidepressant action: The coffee paradox   genomicpress.kglmeridian.... · Posted by u/PaulHoule
georgemcbay · 10 days ago
Wholly anecdotal, but as a 52 year old nearly-lifelong caffeine (ab)user I quit this year and the withdrawal period was horrendous -- not for the headaches everyone knows about (they were bad but only lasted a couple of days) but for the somewhat extended depression/anhedonia which I had never really experienced before.

I was worried during that stretch of time that maybe the caffeine had been masking some underlying depression I already had, but a couple of weeks in it passed, so I think my brain just needed to rebalance itself to the new caffeine-free reality.

I'm glad I quit (less anxiety, better sleep, I'm finding it a lot easier to eat healthy while not buzzed on caffeine all the time, and the depressive episode was temporary) but going through that makes it pretty easy for me to believe caffeine can have rather powerful effects in this area.

georgemcbay commented on 1GB Raspberry Pi 5, and memory-driven price rises   raspberrypi.com/news/1gb-... · Posted by u/shrx
wqaatwt · 14 days ago
> time for computers and their components

Seems it has been the opposite for some components like GPUs though for years (well before the AI boom)

georgemcbay · 14 days ago
Speaking as someone who used to buy them regularly to support a PC gaming hobby stretching back to the original glQuake -- GPUs were on average very reasonably priced prior to the crypto boom that preceded the AI boom.

So its technically not AI "ruining everything" here, but there was a nice, long before-time of reasonable pricing.

georgemcbay commented on It’s been a very hard year   bell.bz/its-been-a-very-h... · Posted by u/surprisetalk
ako · 14 days ago
AI is just a tool, like most other technologies, it can be used for good and bad.

Where are you going to draw the line? Only if it effects you, or maybe we should go back to using coal for everything, so the mineworkers have their old life back? Or maybe follow the Amish guidelines to ban all technology that threatens sense of community?

If you are going to draw a line, you'll probably have to start living in small communities, as AI as a technology is almost impossible to stop. There will be people and companies using it to it's fullest, even if you have laws to ban it, other countries will allow it.

georgemcbay · 14 days ago
> AI is just a tool, like most other technologies, it can be used for good and bad.

The same could be said of social media for which I think the aggregate bad has been far greater than the aggregate good (though there has certainly been some good sprinkled in there).

I think the same is likely to be true of "AI" in terms of the negative impact it will have on the humanistic side of people and society over the next decade or so.

However like social media before it I don't know how useful it will be to try to avoid it. We'll all be drastically impacted by it through network effects whether we individually choose to participate or not and practically speaking those of us who still need to participate in society and commerce are going to have to deal with it, though that doesn't mean we have to be happy about it.

georgemcbay commented on We stopped roadmap work for a week and fixed bugs   lalitm.com/fixits-are-goo... · Posted by u/lalitmaganti
khannn · 21 days ago
I had a job that required estimation on bug tickets. It's honestly amazing how they didn't realize that I'd take my actual estimate, then multiply it by 4, then use the extra time to work on my other bug tickets that the 4x multiplier wasn't good enough for.
georgemcbay · 21 days ago
Are you sure they didn't realize it...?

Virtually everywhere I've ever worked has had an unwritten but widely understood informal policy of placing a multiple on predicted effort for both new code/features and bug fixing to account for Hofstadter's law.

georgemcbay commented on Boom, bubble, bust, boom. Why should AI be different?   crazystupidtech.com/2025/... · Posted by u/speckx
kittikitti · 24 days ago
This is another doomer article about AI. The author openly admits to using AI for the article and the irony isn't lost on me. How long will we be hearing about the AI bubble?
georgemcbay · 24 days ago
People continued to use the internet during and after the very real ".com" bubble burst.

LLMs can be useful tools in the right situations and the valuations for companies involved with them can be wildly and irrationally inflated at the same time.

georgemcbay commented on YouTube Is Awful. I'm Not Posting There Anymore   joshgriffiths.site/youtub... · Posted by u/speckx
georgemcbay · a month ago
Values and creator-side issues aside, YouTube is just awful to use in its natural state just from a user experience perspective.

Way too many ads per minute of content watched, the ads are all extremely low quality and a lot of them are just outright scams these days.

You can solve this to some degree (on some devices) using adblockers, but YouTube has been going out of its way over the past year making this as difficult as possible.

And there are non-ad issues as well, eg. the algorithm absolutely sucks at discovering new content.

georgemcbay commented on Oracle hit hard in Wall Street's tech sell-off over its AI bet   ft.com/content/583e9391-b... · Posted by u/1vuio0pswjnm7
danielbln · a month ago
_sigh_

Yes LLMs hallucinate, no it's no longer 2022 and ChatGPT (gpt-3.5) is the pinnacle of LLM tech. Modern LLMs in an agentic loop can self correct, you still need to be on guard but if used correctly (yes, yes, holding it wrong etc. etc.) can do many, many tasks that do not suffer from "need to check every single time".

georgemcbay · a month ago
> Modern LLMs in an agentic loop can self correct

If the problem as stated is "Performing an LLM query at newly inflated cost $X is an iffy value proposition because I'm not sure if it will give me a correct answer" then I don't see how "use a tool that keeps generating queries until it gets it right" (which seems like it is basically what you are advocating for) is the solution.

I mean, yeah, the result will be more correct answers than if you just made one-off queries to the LLM, but the costs spiral out of control even faster because the agent is going to be generating more costly queries to reach that answer.

georgemcbay commented on Oracle hit hard in Wall Street's tech sell-off over its AI bet   ft.com/content/583e9391-b... · Posted by u/1vuio0pswjnm7
JCM9 · a month ago
I’m bullish on AI as tech but folks are starting to sniff out that the financials of everything going on at the moment aren’t sustainable for much longer.

I hope we have more of a “reality correction” than full blown bubble bursting, but the data is increasingly looking like we’re about to have a massive implosion that wipes out a generation of startups and sets the VC ecosystem back a decade.

georgemcbay · a month ago
> I’m bullish on AI as tech

I'm not bullish in the stock market sense.

Which isn't the same as saying LLMs and related technology aren't useful... they are.

But as you mentioned the financials don't make sense today, and even worse than that, I'm not sure how they could get the financials to make sense because no player in the space on the software side has a real moat to speak of, and I don't believe its possible to make one.

People have preferences over which LLM does better at job $XYZ, but I don't think the differences would stand up to large price changes. LLM A might feel like its a bit better of a coding model than LLM B, but if LLM A suddenly cost 2x-3x, most people are going to jump to LLM B.

If they manage to price fix and all jump in price, I think the amount of people using them would drop off a cliff.

And I see the ultimate end result years from now (when the corporate LLM providers might, in a normal market, finally start benefiting from a cross section of economies of scale and their own optimizations) being that most people will be able to get by using local models for "free" (sans some relatively small buy-in cost, and whatever electricity they use).

u/georgemcbay

KarmaCake day15017September 15, 2010
About
george@mcbay.net
View Original