Readit NewsCheck out the 1994 Budapest Memorandum where Russia, USA and UK all agreed to preserve Ukraine’s borders in return for them giving their nukes to Russia.
All parties seen to have forgotten about that one
Also the article is about kids. They have time for this to become a problem.
In theory, all the money wagered is money that has already paid income tax at some point so why tax it again?
Note that ISO also permits a double hyphen as the interval separator which is hugely preferable to me personally and also works with file names (as mentioned in that Wikipedia article)
Never entirely sure why I love it so much. First read it as a child when I hated apparently similar books - stories that seem written to speak to an adult’s idea of a sweet and innocent childhood - but it would always transport me… somewhere… I could never really describe. Still can’t, but still love it decades later
Easy. When it is you or your allies committing an act, it is war and collateral damage. When it is someone else, it is terrorism.
It is often a difficult topic to discuss because both sides tend to be in the wrong. It ends up being asymmetrical warfare. The stronger side accuses the weaker of hiding behind civilians while the weaker side accuses the stronger of human rights violations.
As sad as this case is, I find it pretty interesting since it is clearly an extrajudicial act of violence carried out in a foreign land. The west will likely celebrate this, but I personally find this much worse than the Indian assassination that took place in Canada "recently" and didn't have significant collateral damage, yet the west was up in arms about.
War is attacking military targets to reduce the enemy’s capability to wage war against you.
Civilian target = terrorism
Military target = war
There absolutely are grey areas and overlap between the two but not nearly as much as people like to make out.
And failed. Other people’s jobs always look easy from the outside
Not in the places I worked. Not at all! There were confidential matters that only people with dedicated responsibility can access and act on. Otherwise it would be a disaster whenever a less honest employee come accross data useful to act on the companies behalf or worse, act directly pretending being one of those eligible people.
Then I wonder how this bots handle the info. Are those scanning through what's there and build the knowledge into self? I guess so, otherwise how would know what is what when asked about, if something is a thing and being there at all. And then if having limited access then the bot would be clueless about some important things the people with elevated credentials need. Or, if can scan everything, I mean everything!, then that data is built into the bot, it 'knows' it, so it is just time tricking to give it out to those not eligible. Pretending being someone, or pretending getting received elevated credentails, or who knows what ways could be there to trick and squeeze that knowledge out from these chatty things. Or can be there several different bots, training multitude of bots, some left clueless like an ordinary employee and not let talk to, the CEO having an administrative bot that knows it all? I am jut trying to imagine being complete outsider how these things work.
Copilot only has access to whatever the user has access to - it uses the same permissions.
The copilot bots in the article are slightly different from normal copilot so might have elevated permissions but if you are creating a service with access to your data then you should make sure it has the correct restrictions in place - there is nothing special about copilot in this regard.
Rhymes with no-op