The point is that the company doesn't need the managers.
This is actually a very fast learning curve. Imagine a typical Python/JS developer becoming proficient with real, production-quality C++ in 3 months? The very notion seems ludicrous to even think about. So the Rust folks are not wrong when they point out that Rust is about empowering developers and enabling higher quality software across the board.
That’s kind of the whole point of this debate. Should we change the laws and if so, how?
It's a good thing I never mentioned right or wrong.
They are a tens-of-billions company. Why is this news? Shouldn't this be just part of doing business?
I have a ton of respect for calligraphers and believe they are artists, but at the same time I don't think that the millions of people who create custom fonts or use custom fonts are doing a bad thing.
More importantly, Alex is not arguing for you not to build things with JavaScript either!
He's arguing against writing inefficient JavaScript where you ship MBs of code to the browser to serve simple functionality.
Scroll to the footnotes and you'll find a big list of JavaScript frameworks which Alex does recommend, because they optimize for performance and low overhead.
Deleted Comment
Deleted Comment