The cat is out of the bag on this one though. So much so, that I'd argue the video now has cultural and historical significance that justifies its wanton violence. That is to say, even a general purpose video platform that forbade violence should probably still allow war documentaries.
>punching someone outside of a boxing ring
I could probably find 100,000 unique instances of violence solely from big Hollywood studios on Youtube as we speak
I've thought a bit about this, and really, I don't see any reason why it has to be a physician that does these things. Why can't we change the law to allow an RN or some other qualified but cheaper medical practitioner to write adderall scripts? Why do we need someone who went to 8 years of higher ed and several years of residency to do that?
It reminds me of eyeglasses in the UK. Prior to 1984, you had to get them through a licensed ophthalmologist. As a result, it was quite a process and expensive to get a pair of them. Then in 1984, it was deregulated and now you can go to SpecSavers and get a pair of eyeglasses for cheap. There was no reason that a licensed and well paid ophthalmologist had to gatekeep it.
For us we are always implementing complex new logic for not very many users, so there's not much benefit to some clever data structure that we are all too dumb to understand. If I get a ticket that involves inserting something into the logic you wrote, and I can't understand how to operate your current solution, I will be hacking up an n logn solution as long as it is adequately performant
If it is some very big and very critical system then yes, code reviews can be beneficial compared to the alternative. But for systems that are innovative and rapidly going through iterations as it is, it's better to judge coverage of test cases (and adequate performance but not optimal)
The pedants also can't figure why nothing gets done.
Yay free money!