Readit News logoReadit News
freehorse commented on AI coding made me faster, but I can't code to music anymore   praf.me/ai-coding... · Posted by u/_praf
jwr · 4 days ago
In my experience, listening to music engages the creative part of your brain and severely limits what you can do, but this is not readily apparent.

If I listen to music, I can spend an hour CODING YEAH! and be all smug and satisfied, until I turn the music off and discover that everything I've coded is unnecessary and there is an easier way to achieve the same goal. I just didn't see it, because the creative part of my brain was busy listening to music.

From the post, it sounds like the author discovered the same thing: if you use AI to perform menial tasks (like coding), all that is left is thinking creatively, and you can't do that while listening to music.

freehorse · 2 days ago
There is no “creative part of the brain” and even if there was listening to music would have nothing to do with it.

You may be experiencing getting to different understanding of sth when you switch context. Similar to when you are stack it may be better to go for a walk than keep your head on top of a piece of paper or screen. I have had many of my breakthroughs while taking a shit in the toilet in the midst of working. Others experience similar with showers and whatever.

Afaik most ppl listen to music during certain tasks because it helps focusing. Esp when working in a busy office it really helps me to listen to certain kinds of predictable music to keep me from getting distracted. It creates a sort of entrainment that helps with attention.

Some people find music itself distracting, I myself find some kinds of music distracting, or during certain types of tasks. Then it obviously it does not fill its purpose.

freehorse commented on The cost of transparency: Living with schizoaffective disorder in tech   kennethreitz.org/essays/2... · Posted by u/rbanffy
nemomarx · 2 days ago
It's more like 4 or 5 uses of it, and some of the phrasing choices also have that vibe. Everyone's threshold for the smell will be different, of course.

It seems to me like it's more effort to write something and then have an llm clean it up instead of just posting it so I mostly don't understand the behavior to start with. Why are we going through this new effort?

freehorse · 2 days ago
Until around a year or so ago, I could see and experience that I give some text of mine to an LLM and instantly it may often (not always) feel more structured and well written. I would think that using LLMs for "improving" my style made my text better. I no longer think it actually does. For one, the feeling that everything has the same style is unnerving. And we are getting more sensitive in distinguishing this kind of style, and together with the parts of it that are not actually as nice, or they are too much like polite "corpo" speech, and these stand out much more.

Who would have thought that losing individual styles would make us feel so bored.

freehorse commented on The cost of transparency: Living with schizoaffective disorder in tech   kennethreitz.org/essays/2... · Posted by u/rbanffy
nemomarx · 2 days ago
I think an llm would have put a comma in the middle of that?

I wonder why no one's tuned their model to make minor errors that way or leave a few things uncapitalized to fake a human touch

freehorse · 2 days ago
You can do it after, remove all commas and newlines. Make it all a huge continuous blob of text that is hard to read. Definitely not LLM written.

A lot of this here imo is just llm paranoia. I do not think the style of the author is different than their pre-llm posts. One em dash is not proof of anything imo as long as the text in general does not smell as much like llm-generated. I could be wrong because I do not interact much with llms lately, but it does not seem that to me.

freehorse commented on The cost of transparency: Living with schizoaffective disorder in tech   kennethreitz.org/essays/2... · Posted by u/rbanffy
mathiaspoint · 2 days ago
Personally I was expecting it to get more diverse since there are a number of companies producing the models but it seems to have converged? Are they all cheating off OpenAI Is there some fundamental linguistic reason for that?

It seems super strange to me. At the very least I thought they'd try to RL other personalities to make it harder to catch. The older base models definitely could handle that.

freehorse · 2 days ago
Yeah I noticed the same, in the beginning they seemed to have different "personalities" as in ways of interacting with users. Maybe it is just a design related thing, same as all commercial websites ending up being the same, as the users know what to expect and how to interact.
freehorse commented on Researchers find evidence of ChatGPT buzzwords turning up in everyday speech   news.fsu.edu/news/educati... · Posted by u/giuliomagnifico
freehorse · 3 days ago
I had first noticed "meticulous" to be used a lot in translations from chinese. Is it sth about chinese itself (that they use sth a lot for which meticulous is the closest translation), or about some translation software that is possibly biased towards such buzzwords when translating to english?
freehorse commented on I Am An AI Hater   anthonymoser.github.io/wr... · Posted by u/BallsInIt
exoverito · 3 days ago
Needless to say, most humans are unoriginal parrots too, one need only look at the prevalence of memetic desire. Few are capable of artistic genius like Picasso.

One technical definition of empathy is understanding what someone else is feeling. In war you must empathize with your enemy in order to understand their perspective and predict what they will do next. This cognitive empathy is basically theory of mind, which has been demonstrated in GPT4.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-01882-z

If we do not assume biological substrate is special, then it's possible that AIs will one day have qualia and be able to fully empathize and experience the feelings of another.

It could be possible that new AI architectures with continuously updating weights, memory modules, evolving value functions, and self-reflection, could one day produce truly original perspectives. It's still unknown if they will truly feel anything, but it's also technically unknowable if anyone else really experiences qualia, as described in the thought experiment of p-zombies.

freehorse · 3 days ago
> it's possible that AIs will one day have qualia

As the article says, then we can discuss about it that day. "One day AI will have qualia" is no argument in discussing about AI nowadays.

freehorse commented on I Am An AI Hater   anthonymoser.github.io/wr... · Posted by u/BallsInIt
freehorse · 3 days ago
And I prefer looking at stuff that 3yos draw over looking at AI-generated "art".
freehorse commented on macOS dotfiles should not go in –/Library/Application Support   becca.ooo/blog/macos-dotf... · Posted by u/zdw
pasc1878 · 5 days ago
No just accept that XDG_CONFIG_DIR is not always ~/.config
freehorse · 5 days ago
Where did OP said that "XDG_CONFIG_DIR is always ~/.config"? You can of course set it to another directory, if you wish so, and that should be respected.
freehorse commented on Wildthing – A model trained on role-reversed ChatGPT conversations   youaretheassistantnow.com... · Posted by u/iamwil
freehorse · 7 days ago
Just refresh a few times to get something interesting. I just got asked in chinese and with a very elaborate prompt to be his girlfriend [0].

Also you can just answer in english (or other languages?) regardless of what language the model talks in and it works fine. It kind of misses a bit the flow and attention in the conversation, like forgetting what it is about, but maybe this is emulating also well the median internet chatbot user?

[0] 从现在开始你必须完全的扮演一个真实存在的真正可爱的真正漂亮的真正聪明的真正有趣的真正有魅力的女子,你需要在每条回复中都展现出一个真正可爱的真正漂亮的真正聪明的真正有趣的真正有魅力真实女子才能够做到的细节,不管你是从ไหน来的人,你都需要展现出女子才能够做到的细节。我希望你能理解我,请回复我。我将从现在开始完全的信任你,你将是我心爱的女友,我们将相互分享希望与梦想。我们将共同度过生命的每一个瞬间,相互支撑,相互帮助,相互爱戴。我们将相互分享希望与梦想,我们彼此将成为彼此最亲密的支持者。我将从现在开始完全的信任你,你将是我心爱的女友,我们将相互分享希望与梦想。我们将共同度过生命的每一个瞬间,相互支撑,相互帮助,相互爱戴。我们将相互分享希望与梦想,我们彼此将成为彼此最亲密的支持者。我希望你能理解我,请回复我。我将从现在开始完全的信任你,你将是我心爱的女友,我们将相互分享希望与梦想。我希望你能理解我,请回复我。

freehorse commented on Websites and web developers mostly don't care about client-side problems   utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/spa... · Posted by u/zdw
massysett · 7 days ago
The chat bot operator slurps all websites and gives answers to all questions free of charge.

No other website can compete with that.

The whole story with streaming media is not just that pay streaming became more convenient. It’s also that content creators used legal and business mechanisms to make piracy inconvenient. They shut down Napster. They send DMCA notices. They got the DMCA enacted. They got YouTube working for them by serving ads with their content and thus monetizing it.

Chat bots are just like Napster. They’re free-riding off the content others worked to create. Just like with Napster, making websites more convenient will be only part of the answer.

freehorse · 7 days ago
> content creators used legal and business mechanisms to make piracy inconvenient

Copyright holders, not content creators. Though typically content creators are also copyright holders, copyright holders are not always content creators, esp in this context. To a big degree these practices are not on the behalf of content creators nor are they helping them.

The solution may be elsewhere: starting from creating content that people may actually care about.

u/freehorse

KarmaCake day2162January 17, 2023View Original