Readit News logoReadit News
forgotpwagain commented on One universal antiviral to rule them all?   cuimc.columbia.edu/news/o... · Posted by u/breve
ajmurmann · 6 months ago
Doesn't sound all the bad from the linked wiki:

""" In March 2024 Kimer Med announced it has signed a contract valued at up to USD$750,000 (NZD$1.3 million) with Battelle Memorial Institute (Battelle), the world’s largest independent, nonprofit research and development organization. The contract is focused on the discovery and development of new antiviral drug candidates for the treatment of alphaviruses. """

forgotpwagain · 6 months ago
The cynical part of me wonders: if this has been a promising approach for 10+ years, why weren't they able to secure VC funding years ago (or nonprofit biomedical research funding from places like the Gates Foundation that care a lot about infectious disease)?
forgotpwagain commented on Launch HN: BlankBio (YC S25) – Making RNA Programmable    · Posted by u/antichronology
antichronology · 7 months ago
We think that Orthrus can be applied in a bunch of ways to non-coding and coding RNA sequences but it's definitely fair we're a bit more focused on RNA sequences currently instead of non-coding parts of the genome like promoters and intergenic sequences.

For the data - Orthrus is trained on non experimentally collected data so our pre-training dataset is large by biological standards. It adds up to about 45 million unique sequences and assuming 1k tokens per sequence it's about 50b tokens.

We're thinking about this as large pre-training run on a bunch of annotation data from Refseq and Gencode in conjunction with more specialized Orthology datasets that are pooling data across 100s of species.

Then for specific applications we are fine tuning or doing linear probing for experimental prediction. For example we can predict half life using publicly available data collected by the awesome paper from: https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13...

Or translation efficency: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39149337/

Eventually as we ramp up out wet lab data generation we're thinking about what does post-training look like? There is an RL analog here that we can use on these generalizable embeddings to demonstrate "high quality samples".

There are some early attempts at post-training in bio and I think it's a really exciting direction

forgotpwagain · 7 months ago
Thanks for the response! This is very cool and sounds like a reasonable plan. Best of luck!
forgotpwagain commented on Launch HN: BlankBio (YC S25) – Making RNA Programmable    · Posted by u/antichronology
forgotpwagain · 7 months ago
I am totally onboard with the premise (as a TechBio-adjacent person), and some of the approaches you're taking (focused domain-specific models like Orthrus, rather than massive foundation models like Evo2).

I'm curious about what your strategy is for data collection to fuel improved algorithmic design. Are you building out experimental capacity to generate datasets in house, or is that largely farmed out to partners?

forgotpwagain commented on Super-resolution microscopes reveal new details of cells and disease   knowablemagazine.org/cont... · Posted by u/rbanffy
forgotpwagain · 8 months ago
There are biotech companies like Eikon Therapeutics (https://www.eikontx.com/ ) where super-resolution microscopy in living cells is a central part of the platform.

There is also one widespread approach that isn't mentioned in the article: expansion microscopy. Expansion takes the scifi-sounding approach of: what if you could make your sample physically bigger? See the Wikipedia page for more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_microscopy

forgotpwagain commented on Third patient dies from acute liver failure caused by a Sarepta gene therapy   biocentury.com/article/65... · Posted by u/randycupertino
forgotpwagain · 8 months ago
A thread from yesterday about why gene therapy hasn't reached its potential: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44573193
forgotpwagain commented on AlphaGenome: AI for better understanding the genome   deepmind.google/discover/... · Posted by u/i_love_limes
jebarker · 8 months ago
I don't think DM is the only lab doing high-impact AI applications research, but they really seem to punch above their weight in it. Why is that or is it just that they have better technical marketing for their work?
forgotpwagain · 8 months ago
DeepMind/Google does a lot more than the other places that most HN readers would think about first (Amazon, Meta, etc). But there is a lot of excellent work with equal ambition and scale happening in pharma and biotech, that is less visible to the average HN reader. There is also excellent work happening in academic science as well (frequently as a collaboration with industry for compute). NVIDIA partners with whoever they can to get you committed to their tech stack.

For instance, Evo2 by the Arc Institute is a DNA Foundation Model that can do some really remarkable things to understand/interpret/design DNA sequences, and there are now multiple open weight models for working with biomolecules at a structural level that are equivalent to AlphaFold 3.

forgotpwagain commented on A Primer on Molecular Dynamics   owlposting.com/p/a-primer... · Posted by u/EvgeniyZh
seamossfet · 9 months ago
Great write up, we're working on a drug discovery CAD tool and MD has been one of our focal points. Extremely challenging and fun problem to work on!

What complicates things is the experimental data we get back from labs to validate MD behavior is extremely tricky to work with. Most of what we're working with is NMR data which shows flexibility in areas of the proteins, but even then we're left with these mathematical models to attempt to "make sense" of the flexibility and infer dynamics from that. Sometimes it feels like an art and a science trying to get meaningful insights for lab data like this.

It's extremely difficult to experimentally verify any MD model since, as mentioned in the article, most of the data we're working with are static mugshots in the form of crystal structures.

forgotpwagain · 9 months ago
Very cool. There are also methods that allow you to extract some notion of motion from variability in CryoEM data, e.g. CryoDRGN-ET [1].

I'm curious if you've worked with any of those models and how they relate to NMR data and MD simulations.

[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-024-02340-4

forgotpwagain commented on Open-sourcing circuit tracing tools   anthropic.com/research/op... · Posted by u/jlaneve
Eduard · 9 months ago
thought this was about PCB tracing and was disappointed.
forgotpwagain · 9 months ago
thought this was about tracing neural circuits in the brain and was disappointed.
forgotpwagain commented on Baby is healed with first personalized gene-editing treatment   nytimes.com/2025/05/15/he... · Posted by u/jbredeche
forgotpwagain · 10 months ago
Detailed New England Journal of Medicine article about this case: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2504747

And an Editorial piece (more technical than the NYT): https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2505721

u/forgotpwagain

KarmaCake day279November 1, 2015View Original