> Finally, can it be flown legally? Most of the trajectory can pass over the oceans, but skipping land completely would take too much of a detour, and likely be incompatible with prevailing winds. Although the political climate may be hostile, it is still legal to fly civil craft over other countries.
So no, it's not legal in many ways.
There is no European country which does a worse job at both of these. Germany is easily the number one country in the world for "protocol is everything". It doesn't matter how detrimental and damaging the rules are, the rules are the rules, and they must be followed. This case is the millionth example. The rules are interpretable as it being illegal to access data with a publically available password using this password, so we're going to apply them, despite it being patently absurd. For the first point, German's reponse to Gaza (the slowest in all of the West) said everything.
- Every country develops its own solution, which is good for employee demand, but can be inefficient
- Every country standardizes on a proprietary solution. The problem will be that said solution will most likely come from one of the major EU countries (say Germany) and others will feel left out and forced to use that solution. Said solution will be Germany-first, so local demands will have to go a slow and expensive contracting process. Said company will sell access to APIs, meaning integrating and building innovation on top will be tied to that commercial entity
- Every country uses the same standard software that's open source. There's no licensing fees, everyone can modify the code to accomodate local needs. Development costs are low. Proprietary local solution can be built on top without having to pay anyone.
It's clear to me, that when the customer is the public, and open-source solution should be preferred.
Anyway, open source is fine there. But you're not getting things like a Desktop or Web office suite (OpenOffice is an historical accident), an enterprise device management, endpoint security, ... this way.
It doesn't matter if the email platform a government uses is open source, but it should be able to pick a local alternative. It does not matter if the e-ID or payments app is running on an open source mobile OS, but it should be possible to run it on a non-US one.
Policy may help the European software industry, at least governments should actively work on getting away from their Microsoft addiction. Open source may be one of the options, but it is not the right model for all types of software.
Blindly preferring open source may kill otherwise viable local software businesses.
At Quobyte we are working on a highly scalable and fault-tolerant software storage system built around a parallel file system core. Our customers use us for large scale AI and HPC clusters in the enterprise and research, k8s and OpenStack infrastructures, and as a scalable backend for SaaS products. There are Quobyte clusters which span tens of thousands of machines and slurp 100s of GB/s!
Under the hood, we have built a full-stack fault-tolerant parallel file system, with everything from kernel development over our own replicated database system design to distributed algorithms (Paxos!) and performance. In short: lots of real-world challenging and fun problems!
We work as a highly efficient engineering team, ship frequently, do code reviews, and have lots of unit and integration testing. If you’re passionate about systems, we might be the right place for you!
Berlin, Germany:
* Software Engineer (with a passion for Systems)
* DevOps Engineer (for on premises engineering and support infrastructure)
US
* Sales Engineer East Coast, West Coast (remote)
For detailed job descriptions please and application process, please visit https://www.quobyte.com/company/careers or write to work at quobyte.com.