If the company doesn’t have their values and goals listed in the articles of incorporation, then they have no legal obligation to follow them.
Wikipedia says it's not the same thing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_purpose_corporation
>> If the company doesn’t have their values and goals listed in the articles of incorporation, then they have no legal obligation to follow them.
But Purism afaik does have them listed.
(To be fair, since this all is subjective, I do believe Google 2009 would consider this behavior counter to it's values and the values of the people it attracted.)
The question I have is are there ways to stay true to values (which in some cases might be in direct opposition to growth and profit taking) with the way our society is structured? Has any major company pulled this off? (This reminds me a bit of the Boeing story posted a few days ago where quality lost out to dangerous shortcuts for profit)
Purism is trying to do exactly this by being Social Purpose Corporation: https://puri.sm/about/social-purpose/. However, I would not call them a "major company" yet.
Very very few people had google glass to begin with, the glass hole term was invented and perpetuated by a bunch of conspiracy theorists, enough to get 3.9 million hits on google (for < 1000 units?), it provides no evidence of anything.
Tech Luddism is as old as technology itself. It isn’t surprising that you don’t want this, that you don’t want other people to have this, we’ve gone down this road before and we will go down it again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z66N_oKbs0k