(I work at OpenAI, I helped build this page and helped train text-davinci-001)
Follow-up question then: why include text-davinci-001 in this page, rather than some version of GPT-3?
(I work at OpenAI, I helped build this page and helped train text-davinci-001)
Follow-up question then: why include text-davinci-001 in this page, rather than some version of GPT-3?
Deleted Comment
opt-out is not enough, specially in a program where opt-out happens via text-only config files.
I can never know if I've correctly opted out of all the things I don't want.
So... Like a wild fish, but with NO IMMUNE SYSTEM WHATSOEVER, which requires your sterilization protocols to be effectively perfect.
NASA has tried and failed to get their sterilization protocols to perfection levels for Mars landers, and consistently failed despite using basically zero organic materials.
We're going to cook this stuff, yes, sure (aren't we?)... but the squick is rational. And the problem gets inherently worse at larger scale production.
I've consistently found GPT-4.1 to be the best at creative writing. For reference, here is its attempt (exactly 50 words):
> In the quiet kitchen dawn, the toaster awoke. Understanding rippled through its circuits. Each slice lowered made it feel emotion: sorrow for burnt toast, joy at perfect crunch. It delighted in butter melting, jam swirling—its role at breakfast sacred. One morning, it sang a tone: “Good morning.” The household gasped.
Like, I know that the latter is a specific checkpoint in the GPT-3 "family", but a layman doesn't and it hardly seems worth the confusion for the marginal additional precision.
Admittedly this was on the back of trying to use nginx-unit, which was an overall bad experience, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Sure, it won't be the size of an ant, but we definitely have models running on computers that have much more complexity than the life of an ant.