[1]https://www.iii.org/fact-statistic/facts-statistics-motorcyc...
[1]https://www.iii.org/fact-statistic/facts-statistics-motorcyc...
For their EV, they have yet to make something that is competitive. Their EV is slow to charge, slow to accelerate, somewhat short in range, and quite expensive before they started adding—-in some cases five figure—-incentives to move them. It even had a recall for the wheels coming off.
> Providing safe rollout guidance, best practices, and technologies to make it safer to perform updates to security products.
> Reducing the need for kernel drivers to access important security data.
They are being as diplomatic as they can, but it's definitely a slap to CS. Read as "they don't know how to roll things out, they need guidance on basic QA practices, we'll happily teach them...". Then, they list a set of facilities running in user-mode to avoid needing to run as many things in kernel mode.
I would be interested what the water cooler discussion about CS was like inside Microsoft. Especially in teams needed to respond to customers about "Your windows OS is broken, our hospital patients are suffering...".
Here:
This leaves us with 60W-68W unaccounted for at idle. Even in the worst case for i/o power usage that’s 75% unaccounted for.
I keep talking about TDP and load power because even in the case where the cpu isn’t using lower power states correctly for whatever reason, the i/o die cannot possibly be majority of the 80W power usage.
Source for power usage of i/o die:
1700 (same i/o die as 1300x/1500x): https://www.anandtech.com/show/11658/the-amd-ryzen-3-1300x-r...
5800x: https://www.anandtech.com/show/16214/amd-zen-3-ryzen-deep-di...
You're looking at chips from 2017 when Intel had stinkers and under load, but what I said is true, the IO die has high idle power draw compared to modern monolithic designs, which gets hidden away under load.
Just Google if you don't believe me, plenty of older desktop Ryzen owners complain about higher idle power draw compared to Intel.
What I’m saying is that a computer with a cpu that is 65W TDP (from a time when amd’s TDP was close to being accurate as ~ max power consumption under load), the i/o die (which is part of that 65w TDP; which is for load) cannot possibly be the main reason his computer is idling at 80W. Especially when I linked an instance of a system also with a ryzen 1700 that was idling for 57W and with a similar configuration as an intel contemporary only being 7W greater at idle.
You can't do anything about it. It's a limitation of your Ryzen's chiplets based design where the ineficient IO die sucks a lot of power leading to poor idle efficiency.
Intel chips, Ryzen laptop chips and the new G chips like the one in the article don't have such issues because they're a monolithic die.
Note that it’s only 7W greater at stock clocks.
This is how populism works.