Readit News logoReadit News
eudoxus commented on Ask HN: Who is hiring? (May 2025)    · Posted by u/whoishiring
eudoxus · 4 months ago
Source (https://source.network)| USA/Canada: REMOTE | Full-Time | https://careers.source.network

At Source, we aim to revolutionize developer data management for the open web. Our mission is to simplify data handling for edge devices, local-first software, and distributed infrastructures, allowing developers to unleash their creativity and build world-changing tools that realize the open web’s full potential.

Our suite of new technologies work together to make it easy for developers to ship edge and local-first software. We empower developers to create software and devices that seamlessly communicate, offer granular data control, and secure data cryptographically to ensure trust. Join us in shaping the future of data management and the open web.

We’re growing fast and are looking to fill the below positions:

ENGINEERING

-Protocol Engineer (Distributed Systems) - https://bit.ly/3WxBgRQ

-Software Engineer, Backend (Database) - https://bit.ly/4iiqOaZ

See all our open positions here: https://careers.source.network/

eudoxus commented on Show HN: StoffelVM – A WIP VM for Multiparty Computation   github.com/Stoffel-Labs/S... · Posted by u/badcryptobitch
eudoxus · 5 months ago
Can you describe the connection between the "VM" and the "MPC" implementation. The project is described as a VM for Multiparty computation, but (currently) doesn't do MPC? Implying its currently just a certain kind of VM?

Genuinely curious, fan of any tooling that makes writing MPC protocols easier.

eudoxus commented on Show HN: I built a Matrix themed AI hacking game   matrix.repello.ai... · Posted by u/emoclew
eudoxus · 6 months ago
hard no on the unnecessary login, apologies, looks at least surface level interesting
eudoxus commented on MongoDB acquires Voyage AI   investors.mongodb.com/new... · Posted by u/marc__1
codr7 · 6 months ago
Whatever respect I had left for MongoDB just went out the window, the last thing I want in my database is AI.
eudoxus · 6 months ago
Aside from the MongoDB of it all, wheres the issue with adding "AI" here? As I understand it this is just vector types, similarity searches, embedding indexes, and RAG capabilities.

All of which are just data storage/retrieval mechanics and custom types. This isn't adding some omnipotent AI agent to run/manage/optimize your DB or otherwise turn it into some blackbox gizmo.

eudoxus commented on From where I left   antirez.com/news/144... · Posted by u/tilt
gpderetta · 9 months ago
Affero GPL-style copyleft licenses are an option, although they are treated as radioactive by most companies. A clause that triggers the extensions over GPL only for companies beyond a certain size might make them more platable.
eudoxus · 9 months ago
> although they are treated as radioactive by most companies

Isn't this reason enough to not consider it an option?

eudoxus commented on Sunlight, a Certificate Transparency log implementation   letsencrypt.org/2024/03/1... · Posted by u/ben_s
kfreds · a year ago
Absolutely. The vast majority of such use cases are way better served by a transparency log than a blockchain.

Imagine an embedded system that only accepts firmware updates that are digitally signed and discoverable in a public append-only log. Such a proof would have to be attached to the firmware update just like the digital signature, with a size constraint on the order of kilobytes. To be fair I haven't kept up-to-date with blockchains, but I find it hard to believe that any existing blockchain could solve this. Transparency logs can.

I wonder when businesses that currently use blockchains as immutable logs will realise that there is a more cost-effective solution. One of the reasons it hasn't happened yet is because blockchains have magnitudes more mindshare than transparency logging. In fact, there doesn't seem to be that many people who deeply understand the design parameter space of transparency logs.

Shameless plug: My colleagues and I have spent a few years designing one - Sigsum. As Filippo mentions he has contributed to its design as well.

eudoxus · a year ago
> To be fair I haven't kept up-to-date with blockchains, but I find it hard to believe that any existing blockchain could solve this. Transparency logs can.

Any insight as to why you think blockchains can't handle this?

The only fundemental difference between blockchains and transparency logs is the trust assumptions and censorship resistence. Its fairly easy to reason about a transparency log as a permissioned blockchain. Conversely, a blockchain could be seen as a permissionless transparency log.

eudoxus commented on A future for SQL on the web (2021)   jlongster.com/future-sql-... · Posted by u/thunderbong
lewisjoe · 2 years ago
I have a pet idea to write a Notion-like tool that works like an old-school desktop app - meaning you should be able to export your pages or the entire database as a single sql file and it should be open-able from somewhere else.

I also want to leverage the web platform (mainly because it's the right thing to do and partly because the web is the only one that offers a decent rich-editor environment without as much plumbing needed if I build natively). So basically a browser app that behaves fully like a desktop app without any needing internet connection.

And for that idea to become reality james long's absurd sql is basically the key. Without such persistent sql based db to work with, that ideas is never going to materialize :)

eudoxus · 2 years ago
Have you checked out Anytype[0]. Was recently posted/discussed here on HN a few days ago[1].

No affiliation, just interesting project that aligns with your description.

[0]: https://anytype.io/ [1]:https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38794733

eudoxus commented on Let's Talk About Open Source   blog.sentry.io/lets-talk-... · Posted by u/kiwicopple
Pet_Ant · 2 years ago
> If you’re unfamiliar, the BUSL can easily be summarized as an eventual open-source license. That is, it’s a restrictive license that after a period of time will convert to another license, in our case Apache-2.0.

Haven’t read the license but if it works as described I’d say it is open source. It has been irrevocably released to the open source ecosphere at a concrete future date. If someone handed you a post-dated cheque would you say “I didn’t get the money” or “they haven’t paid”? If his description is accurate it’s been released as Apache it’s just in public escrow.

eudoxus · 2 years ago
It is accurate, this is how BUSL works :). Its irrevocable, the licensed code MUST convert to a license that is compatible with the GPL within a maximum of 4 years. It can be any license, so long as its compatible, and it can of course be sooner than 4 years.

I agree with your sentiment, its escrowed open source, which might be a turn-off for some I guess.

eudoxus commented on Anytype – local-first, P2P Notion alternative   anytype.io/?hn... · Posted by u/TTTZ
Zambyte · 2 years ago
> I guess probably an unpopular opinion here, but I don't see why "open source" must imply that anyone should be allowed to fork the repo and sell it.

Because that is the definition of "Open Source"[0]. As was already said, "source available" is the correct term here.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Open_Source_Definition

eudoxus · 2 years ago
Sorry but this is not the definition of "open source", I would argue there is only a conceptual and cultural definition of "open source". What you are linking to is The Open Source Initiative (OSI) Foundation's declaration called the "Open Source Definition".

They are a single organization, that have done a tremendous job at trying to come up with a global and shared legal framework to which people can license code under. They have gone so far to come up with a pretty good definition of "open source", but not the definition.

This would be equivalent to saying that "Freedom" is defined by the US Constitution or the Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms. It is not, those are both examples of a legal definition of freedom, but neither are the sole authority for the global and cultural concept of "Freedom"

eudoxus commented on Sourcegraph is no longer open source   github.com/sourcegraph/so... · Posted by u/CAP_NET_ADMIN
tremon · 2 years ago
"Source" also was a term and idea predating the first ever computer source code. Definitions can change.
eudoxus · 2 years ago
This is a somewhat pedantic and useless comment. Of course definitions can change, but the notion of "open source" hasn't changed in any significant and notable fashion since it was first coined in the late 90s. Feel free to disprove me.

u/eudoxus

KarmaCake day198October 9, 2012View Original