Readit News logoReadit News
ernesto95 commented on OpenAI o1 system card   openai.com/index/openai-o... · Posted by u/meetpateltech
nichochar · 9 months ago
I have a masters degree in math/physics, and 10+ years of being a SWE in strong tech companies. I have come to rely on these models (Claude > oai tho) daily.

It is insane how helpful it is, it can answer some questions at phd level, most questions at a basic level. It can write code better than most devs I know when prompted correctly...

I'm not saying its AGI, but diminishing it to a simple "chat bot" seems foolish to me. It's at least worth studying, and we should be happy they care rather than just ship it?

ernesto95 · 9 months ago
Interesting that the results can be so different for different people. I have yet to get a single good response (in my research area) for anything slightly more complicated than what a quick google search would reveal. I agree that it’s great for generating quick functioning code though.
ernesto95 commented on Bitcoin puzzle #66 was solved: 6.6 BTC (~$400k) withdrawn   blockchain.com/explorer/a... · Posted by u/mrb
red_admiral · a year ago
Or some other number-theoretic advance that is significantly below exponential time on the particular type of field or curve being used.

The reason that we use elliptic curves these days, or if we must then something like 8k bit keys to get 128 bits of security over finite fields, is that for the old Z^*_q/Z_p setup, such a faster algorithm exists (index calculus).

Someone could in theory find a better calculus that works only for groups with some specific characteristics of Curve25519, for example. No quantum computers needed.

EDIT: we know that no _generic_ faster algorithm exists, that is one independent of the representation of the group involved, for the traditional computing model. But that doesn't exclude algorithms, as I said above, that work for very particular cases.

ernesto95 · a year ago
Do you have a personal book recommendation on the group and/or number theory of this type of cryptography?
ernesto95 commented on On the Double-Slit Experiment and Quantum Interference in the Wolfram Model (2020)   wolframphysics.org/bullet... · Posted by u/floobertoober
nabla9 · 2 years ago
To counter your unenthusiasm, think about it from a mathematician's perspective. Mathematics of QM does not live in some separate corner created to do physics. The need for QM created short-lived confusion, now it's all embedded into a much larger coherent mathematical structure.

For a pure mathematician, quantum mechanics is a lovely introduction to Hilbert Spaces.

ernesto95 · 2 years ago
True, but from a mathematician's point of view, the theory quickly becomes complicated (and in some sense limited) if you really want to do things rigorously when working with continuous systems, something that does not happen with finite dimensional systems as the parent comment probably alludes to.

u/ernesto95

KarmaCake day653February 20, 2014View Original