Edit: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-48989-6_...
Edit: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-48989-6_...
That's perfectly fine. It's also besides the point though. You can learn without reading random people online cynically shit talking others as a self promotion strategy. This is junior dev energy manifesting junior level understanding of the whole problem domain.
There's not a lot to learn from claims that boil down to "don't have bugs".
I might even say that’s a point of attraction for the language. Overwrought IDEs and heavy editors are more optional relative to some languages.
Well, I disagree. What evidence do you have to demonstrate that a) this is true and b) it's so unassailable that one could not deny it?
Because it sure reads like, "I have a worldview. I will assert that it is true and talk down to anyone who does not accept my worldview as truth." It's a way to paint your discussion partner as an intellectual lesser, while adroitly dodging critique. You'll have to do better than just asserting something is true because you said so.
I'm a syndicalist anarchist, who believes communities should be primarily bottoms up driven, democratic, and cooperative. I argue we don't need any of those branches to be strong.
The company they hired to do the support tickets archived them, including attachments, rather than deleting them.