This is what I want from a social network.
I want to be able to keep up some regular connection with people I don't see on a regular basis. I want us to remember each other, know about major life events, and have a convenient way to reconnect more personally when that makes sense.
For people I see (or want to talk to) regularly, I'll just send messages or group messages.
For more of the topic-centered type of internet community I may want in my life... well HN already does that perfectly.
But I'm not convinced that this advice can be used to pick your fundamentals, your core business model.
Amazon opted for more choices and lower prices.
Barnes & Noble stuck with faster solutions to problems (get your book today not after a week of shipping as was common when Amazon started), deeper human interactions (you can go into the store and ask someone for recommendations, meet authors, etc.), and increased confidence/trust (you know what you're getting because you can hold it in your hand and read it before you buy it).
Low-cost carriers have moved in on traditional airlines because while it's true that people will never stop caring about added comfort, it turns out they care about lower prices much more.
But Apple built a staggering market cap relying on the assumption that while people care about lower price, they care about great control of your time (just works) and higher social status more.
So it seems like this article provides a good framework for thinking about your business, but doesn't give any answers as to the actual strategy you should use.
Or am I missing something?
There are just choices about what resource you want to prejudice for: money, time or luck.
Who should get to see Taylor Swift? How much should they pay? How should profits be distributed?
These are philosophical questions. If you assume a particular set of answers to these questions, designing the correct sales process is not difficult. But everyone has a different set of answers.
If Kasparov uses chess programs to be better at chess maybe we can use copilot to be better developers?
Also, anyone, either a person or a machine, is welcome to learn from the code I wrote, actually that is how I learnt how to code, so why would I stop others from doing the same?.
But the preference of the majority does not override the conditions placed by people who prefer not to participate.
2. Why did they proceed to have half a dozen different messaging services?
3. Why didn't they relentlessly focus on feature parity with iMessage in the default Messages app on Android phones?
4. Why didn't they invest heavily in a single unified app that iOS users would be attracted to, just like they're attracted to Maps and Mail?
It's really baffling to me how such a smart company has managed to be so dumb.
So I just use WhatsApp.
What I really want is mandatory opt-in to be able to contact me.
Unknown numbers get to send a single standard length SMS, carrier embeds the full legal name and, for businesses, legally registered mailing address, and I can choose whether to accept. If I don't, no other contact from that number is connected to my phone. Ever.
I can also report the message as unsolicited and every company's unsolicited contact stats are made available to regulators.