Readit News logoReadit News
drunner commented on CEO pay and stock buybacks have soared at the largest low-wage corporations   ips-dc.org/report-executi... · Posted by u/hhs
simianwords · 11 days ago
Fair, lets then count income tax which makes it more like $500 assuming net taxes around 40%. I'm ignoring salary increase due to stock valuation going up because it complicates things and there is equal force from both sides of the argument.

So you decide: 20,000 companies running with a CEO being paid like an average person. And every citizen gets $500 in their account per year.

Edit: its not just a CEO but the C suite. 20,000 running without a C suite.

drunner · 11 days ago
I don't think tax is that high for that income bracket but your point still stands for the rules of the current system. I agree with your sentiment there are way better ways to redistribute wealth.

Just dont discount what several hundred bucks means to way too many people in such a prosperous country.

drunner commented on CEO pay and stock buybacks have soared at the largest low-wage corporations   ips-dc.org/report-executi... · Posted by u/hhs
simianwords · 11 days ago
I did an exercise here: the average CEO salary of S&P 500 is around $20M. That's around $10B totally. Assume there are three executives - so thats around $30B annually.

Lets go much further, lets multiply this by 10 to account for top 5000 companies (in practice it would be more like top 20,000 because the lower companies have much lower CEO salaries).

There are around 300 million people in USA. By redistributing the 100% CEO salary you can give around $900 per year to every single person. All this for $900? Which does not even account for income tax paid by CEO's. Edit: after accounting for income tax it is more like $600

So all you have achieved by completely eradicating C suite salary for top 20,000 companies in the USA is around ~$900~ $600 for each individual per year.

I'm increasingly convinced that CEO pay is the wrong place to look at for any impact at all.

Edit: there's more to this if you account for spending patterns.

Even if you give $500 to every citizen, that does not mean affordability will increase because inflation can increase proportionally. This is because even with increased money, each citizen is buying goods amongst the same quantity of goods as before.

For example we can take potatoes: do you think citizens can afford potatoes even more now? No, because the number of potatoes have remained the same. Taking away CEO salary does not mean potato stock would increase because CEO's are not hoarding up potatoes.

drunner · 11 days ago
As shown by the covid payments. $900 a year is a lot of money to a lot of folks.

Heck annual social security average is 24k a year, so you are talking about nearly 4% more money for just those people alone.

drunner commented on Is Germany on the brink of banning ad blockers?   blog.mozilla.org/netpolic... · Posted by u/Vinnl
sneak · 17 days ago
Under a strict reading of copyright law, this actually makes sense.

The problem is that the fundamental concept of IP is nonsensical and insane. When applied rationally, it will of course result in wacky results like this.

drunner · 17 days ago
How does it make sense? If I buy a book I'm entitled to rip out pages and black marker words. What's the difference to removing text or images of my choice while viewing a website?
drunner commented on GPT-5   openai.com/gpt-5/... · Posted by u/rd
hattmall · 25 days ago
I don't understand the doomer mindset. Like what is it that you think AI is going to do or be capable of doing that's so bad?
drunner · 25 days ago
Never seen terminator?

Jokes aside, a true agi would displace literally every job over time. Once agi + robot exists, what is the purpose for people anymore. That's the doom, mass societal existentialism. Probably worse than if aliens landed on earth.

drunner commented on New Study: Waymo is reducing serious crashes and making streets safer   waymo.com/blog/2025/05/wa... · Posted by u/prossercj
drunner · 4 months ago
Once self driving cars take over and fill the streets with gridlock autonomous traffic, the only way to get around in a city is going to be by bike.

Its great to here their algorithms are good for cyclists, a better solution is to keep investing in infrastructure that separates cyclists completely from cars.

drunner commented on A $20k American-made electric pickup with no paint, no stereo, no screen   theverge.com/electric-car... · Posted by u/kwindla
drunner · 4 months ago
Can we do this for combustion cars too please!
drunner commented on Apple needs a Snow Sequoia   reviews.ofb.biz/safari/ar... · Posted by u/trbutler
drunner · 5 months ago
Absolutely drives me nuts that I can't remove the music icon from the systray in Mac. And ditto on all the spotlight issues.

Also, why does it take 10 seconds for activity monitor to show information? The list goes on.

If only Mac hardware officially supported Linux, I would never touch that macOS again.

drunner commented on The School Car Pickup Line Is a National Embarrassment   collegetowns.substack.com... · Posted by u/trevin
delichon · 6 months ago
We can just wait for this problem to go away as robocars becomes the norm. We'll look back on the primitive times when kids couldn't just click a button or whisper an instruction for a ride like anyone else.
drunner · 6 months ago
500 manually driven cars and 500 robocars take the same space. Building schools, cities, and communities in the US that are pedestrian based is the only real solution. The author summarizes as "We need to thicken up our places, slow down cars, and install pedestrian or biking infrastructure" which I couldn't agree with more.
drunner commented on Tesla gets more than 20% of parts from Mexico, it will be affected by tariffs   electrek.co/2025/03/05/te... · Posted by u/zfg
m463 · 6 months ago
Would tariffs affect higher-income folks (imported goods) vs low-income (local food/shelter/clothing)?

Wonder if there's a non-partisan/non-biased website that could give a clear picture

drunner · 6 months ago
You don't need a non biased website to tell you that. Goods costing %25 more affects the low income folks way more.

Think about it this way, eggs go from $3 to $10. Someone with high income is barely affected. If you make min wage at $7 an hour its a huge burden.

drunner commented on Brother refutes "false claims" that it bricked printers using third-party ink   arstechnica.com/gadgets/2... · Posted by u/AdmiralAsshat
ziddoap · 6 months ago
>Why do people always attack these projects on "Hacker" News?

It's not an attack. It's a pertinent statement of fact that some privacy-conscious people may want to consider when choosing their browser.

drunner · 6 months ago
Are the developers on Chrome or Safari not anonymous to you as well? Or basically every piece of software that you did not author yourself?

u/drunner

KarmaCake day560January 11, 2017View Original