Readit News logoReadit News
drchopchop commented on All the sad young terminally online men   derekthompson.org/p/all-t... · Posted by u/gamechangr
jauntywundrkind · 5 months ago
I love how Derek centers on (and summarizes) Jay Van Bavel's characteristics of online discourse, and the four "Dark Laws" he comes out with:

> 1) Negativity bias increases clicks. 2) Extreme opinions increase sharing. 3) Out-group animosity increases engagement. 4) Moral-emotional language goes viral.

These read as all to familiar, strikes me as having all the ingredients to spiral us down into the nightmare of Sagan's Demon Haunted World. Which has been a lovely dark thread going on today. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45404373

It feels like we're deep in the whirlpool of such a radically non-empathetic zero-sum dis-reality based thinking.

drchopchop · 5 months ago
" This group tended to agree with dark pronouncements, such as “I need chaos around me” and “When I think about our political and social institutions, I cannot help thinking ‘just let them all burn.’ ” Petersen and his colleagues came up with an unforgettable term to describe this group’s psychology: “The need for chaos.”"

My take is that a lack of opportunity / class stratification / societal mobility plays into this. It's essentially the same reason people play the lottery. When you're stuck in a seemingly intractable situation, you need the world to suddenly change around you. Maybe you win Powerball, or maybe you decide to just burn everything down out of desperation. Social media just amplifies those thoughts.

drchopchop commented on The dawn of the post-literate society – and the end of civilisation   jmarriott.substack.com/p/... · Posted by u/drankl
drchopchop · 6 months ago
The article references a study which claims that university students have difficulty reading Dickens or Jane Austen. Here's an excerpt of the Dickens from the study:

"LONDON. Michaelmas term lately over, and the Lord Chancellor sitting in Lincoln’s Inn Hall. Implacable November weather. As much mud in the streets, as if the waters had but newly retired from the face of the earth, and it would not be wonderful to meet a Megalosaurus, forty feet long or so, waddling like an elephantine lizard up Holborn Hill. Smoke lowering down from chimney-pots, making a soft black drizzle with flakes of soot in it as big as full-grown snowflakes—gone into mourning, one might imagine, for the death of the sun. Dogs, undistinguishable in mire. Horses, scarcely better; splashed to their very blinkers. Foot passengers, jostling one another’s umbrellas, in a general infection of ill-temper, and losing their foot-hold at street-corners, where tens of thousands of other foot passengers have been slipping and sliding since the day broke (if this day ever broke), adding new deposits to the crust upon crust of mud, sticking at those points tenaciously to the pavement, and accumulating at compound interest."

I'm a college-educated, reasonably well-read person and this is a rough paragraph to get through. Old idioms, excessively lengthy sentences, anachronisms (what is a "horse blinker"? "Michaelmas"?), etc. Why choose this type of subject matter to draw conclusions from?

drchopchop commented on Ask HN: Where to Work After 40?    · Posted by u/asim
justanother · a year ago
As someone comin up on 50 myself, I have to say age has yet to be an issue with my career. Maybe I don't go out of my way to advertise it (cut the resume down to the past 10 or so years, don't have a face full of white hair), but I'm still landing plenty of the same ole gigs with Typescript, Ruby on Rails, Python, whatever the flavor of the month is. So I guess my advice is to just ignore it?

Of course, trying not to giggle at the 28 year old who thinks they need 4 meetings a day for their precious startup is a different matter. But as long as they pay on time...

drchopchop · a year ago
Not advertising it is key. I'm also coming up on 50, and people constantly are surprised when they inevitably find out how old I am. Ageism can unconsciously creep in when you have more than 15 years of experience visible on your resume, even for higher management-level positions.

Also - if you're a mid-level IC in your 40's you should start asking yourself what's stopping you from being higher up on the IC or management tracks. "Career senior engineer" is not a great place to be, long-term.

drchopchop commented on Rails Is Good Enough   onurozer.me/rails-is-good... · Posted by u/onurozer
drchopchop · 2 years ago
Rails may indeed be good enough, but comparing a full-stack platform (Rails) to a frontend UX framework (React) is fundamentally unfair.
drchopchop commented on Jeff Lawson steps down as CEO of Twilio   cnbc.com/2024/01/08/twili... · Posted by u/ceohockey60
yawgmoth · 2 years ago
My take: They're too expensive at volume (and they have competitors, just not famous ones) and not specialized enough / not best in class compared to tools like Klaviyo.
drchopchop · 2 years ago
This. They're great for small/mid-sized developers, but they price themselves out once you're doing billions of messages a month. At that point companies start looking at aggregators one level down (i.e. closer to the carriers or raw SMTP).
drchopchop commented on Microsoft to lay off 11k employees   reuters.com/technology/mi... · Posted by u/georgehill
gowld · 3 years ago
Why? What's wrong with firing people during other economic conditions?

Why would the paperwork be any different, whether it's a small layoff or a big payoff? Ctrl-C/Ctrl-V is cheap, Microsoft implemented it many times in many products.

drchopchop · 3 years ago
Firing IC's at large corporations usually involves some sort of a individual coaching/PIP plan. This takes time for managers and HR to write and implement, takes N weeks of observation, and creates nervousness in coworkers who think they might be next.

Much easier to do a Thanos-style snap and get rid of X% all at once, with no pre-warning or reasons required besides "challenging economic conditions".

drchopchop commented on Comparing Google and ChatGPT   twitter.com/jdjkelly/stat... · Posted by u/xezzed
dougmwne · 3 years ago
Fair point, but Google is also exactly as confidently wrong as GTP. They are both based on Web scrapes of content from humans after all, who are frequently confidently wrong.
drchopchop · 3 years ago
Sure, but Google at least presents itself as being a search engine, composed of potentially unreliable information scraped from the web. GPT looks/feels like an infallible oracle.
drchopchop commented on Comparing Google and ChatGPT   twitter.com/jdjkelly/stat... · Posted by u/xezzed
drchopchop · 3 years ago
It's great, until people realize GPT-3 will generate answers that are demonstrably wrong. (And to make matters worse, can't show/link the source of the incorrect information!)
drchopchop commented on If you (still) work at Twitter and you can code, head to the HQ now   theverge.com/2022/11/18/2... · Posted by u/jbredeche
errantmind · 3 years ago
I'm no Elon fan, but why does essentially everyone in these threads automatically assume he is wrong?

Has no one here worked at companies where there was more dead weight than talent? Where 80% of the work being done is by 20% of the people, and there are whole teams that do almost nothing?

What if there is no clean, efficient way to discover who should be fired and so Elon's fallback plan is to test for who really wants to continue working for the company vs. who is apathetic?

I'm not saying it will necessarily work, but I'm also not going to assume he is grossly incompetent either.

drchopchop · 3 years ago
That would make more sense if 1) he had a coherent plan 2) he could motivate the good 20% to stick around 3) he had some way to differentiate high vs low performers.

Instead, he now gets an effectively random layoff, with potentially whole/important teams vanishing, and biased so that the best people (who can easily find jobs) are most incentivized to leave.

drchopchop commented on If you (still) work at Twitter and you can code, head to the HQ now   theverge.com/2022/11/18/2... · Posted by u/jbredeche
drchopchop · 3 years ago
Lawyers and bankers a) don't fly on their own dime, b) have huge potential financial upside in getting those deals done.

u/drchopchop

KarmaCake day1291March 26, 2020View Original