I earn too much to receive any incentives, so keeping an eye on the used market to buy another Tesla or two (preferably Ys, but would take a 3).
Edit: I enjoy spirited driving, and do so frequently on roads of many different quality across the eastern US and Midwest.
Given how politically impossible it seems to be to increase rates or re-litigate water rights, I think I have to agree with the conclusion of the article: we got to stop eating the meat they're producing.
The health of the Colorado River Basin affects tons of people very directly in the U.S. and Mexico. We have been over-extracting it for ages. I am in favor of wise water usage in non-agricultural settings, but it's time we took action to mitigate the increasingly detrimental impacts of legacy water users from a legacy social and environmental climate.
Pepperidge farm remembers (but only very vaguely, it was a long time ago).
Yes? Of course? They are based on spending surveys:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer_Expenditure_Survey
When people change their habits in life the CPI is changed to reflect what that life costs. Up here in Canada, the CPI is also adjusted from spending surveys:
* https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/survey/household/3508
You can see the list of changes going back to 1913:
* https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/statistical-programs/document/2...
Do you think coal and lard should be included, like they were in Canada pre-1956? Or do you think the CPI should try to model reality?
> […] meaning the data isn't reliable over time.
It is meaningful in that life now and life ten or twenty or more years ago was different in what people purchased. That should be reflected in measures that model consumer spending.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S03014...
You don’t get ”free electricity” with absolutely massive handouts to the nuclear industry.
Instead renewables and storage are delivering on the ”too cheap to meter” promise.