- tool-using animal
- fire-using animal
- language-using animal
- animal which domesticates other animals
- animal which builds complex structures
Aha! I know! We're the only animal which continually comes up with reasons why we're special.
-Starting fires
-Using fire to process food
-Using fire to process raw materials into something that can be used for tools, structures etc.
wage ~ education + experience + error
If the errors are correlated with education or experience, that indicates a confounding variable problem. Most data shows that including race and gender as explanatory factors improves the model: wage ~ education + experience + gender + race + error
Until the coefficients of gender and race become approximately zero, one can say that the market is discriminatory. The counter-argument is that race and gender are not actually the real explanatory variables, but only proxies for better variables, like "ethic" or "determination". Those kinds of arguments are often viewed as racist and sexist. wage ~ education + experience + gender + race + additional_factors + error
where additional_factors consists of other unknown factors (e.g. charisma, intelligence, appearance?). In which case, if education, experience, gender and race are kept constant, there is still going to be a fair bit of variance in wage caused by these unknown factors.Either way, it would be pretty hard to model when these factors are far from orthogonal. Imagine the impact race would have on work experience if race is a big factor when hiring people.
What I was trying to say is, because any gas will diffuse from an area of high concentration to one with a lower concentration, there is no place in Earth's atmosphere one can release gas without it diffusing throughout it. The best you can do is slow the process down.
Does that mean that you could get the same effect from consuming MSG?