yet another SaaS that really does not need to be online 24/7. It could have been a simple app where you could "no code" on local machine and async state with webflow servers.
<button style="css blob">After</button>
Why make a bunch of css classes when it looks to me like the "style" will be roughly the same amount of code and readability.I like to format in logical chunks per line, for example here's a pretty complex grid setup that is easy to adjust in the template:
----
<section className="
w-full
px-8 py-16
md:px-16
">
<div className="
grid
gap-2
auto-rows-[minmax(0px,1fr)]
grid-cols-[repeat(1,minmax(4rem,1fr))]
grid-rows-[repeat(1,minmax(4rem,1fr))]
md:grid-cols-[repeat(6,minmax(6rem,1fr))]
md:grid-rows-[repeat(3,minmax(6rem,1fr))]
xl:grid-cols-[repeat(8,minmax(6rem,1fr))]
xl:grid-rows-[repeat(2,minmax(2rem,1fr))]
justify-center
">
----
I still have qualms with Tailwind. My classic CSS sensibilities are offended, but whatever. The part that I still don't like is really what this post boils down to: a massively complex build system that creates footguns in the weirdest places.
That being said, Tailwind that's set up well in coordination with a complex design system really does feel like it's a win. Seeing that in action was an aha moment where I was able to see value that made some of the tradeoffs worth it.
Can you elaborate on this a little bit — was there a lot of Figma tooling, plugins to swap variables between systems, etc?
If you're using Vue, you even get a <style> block that can be injected into any component so you're still working in the same context. It's all delightful and optional and you can still do whatever you want.
What about a system that could take a really long TW className and let you give it a single name, and you could still append more TW after for here and there adjustments.
But I consider the things important to me, the beliefs, the issues: and they, all of them, align with a progressive, left-leaning ideology. I'm not just glomming on to everything one "tribe" or another stands for ... one group actually reflects everything I believe. (I think I could split a few hairs here and there, but we're still talking perhaps 95% alignment.)
But I don't think that is too surprising. Others, smarter than me, have gone into great detail about the underpinnings of left-leaning or right-leaning world views in people. Fear of change, empathy ... a number of ideas have been put forth. By this reasoning it naturally follows that those of a certain "personality" will also share common beliefs, ideologies.
The implication instead seems to be that unless you are somewhere in the middle of the spectrum you must be "tribal". That feels dismissive.
I guess he had been co-CEO since November. That’s about as smooth of a transition one could hope for? (As far as the company welfare goes.) My thoughts are with his family. An abrupt loss like this must be painful.