Readit News logoReadit News
dgreensp commented on TextKit 2 – The Promised Land   blog.krzyzanowskim.com/20... · Posted by u/nickmain
dgreensp · 10 days ago
This semi-explains why I have started to notice (sadly) serious bugs in TextEdit, not just scrolling but editing/corruption.
dgreensp commented on GPT-5 System Prompt?   github.com/Wyattwalls/sys... · Posted by u/georgehill
dgreensp · 17 days ago
> Never place rich UI elements within a table, list, or other markdown element.

> Place rich UI elements within tables, lists, or other markdown elements when appropriate.

dgreensp commented on Wired Called Our AirGradient Monitor 'Not Recommended' over a Broken Display   airgradient.com/blog/wire... · Posted by u/sklargh
burnt-resistor · 20 days ago
Wired sold-out to Condé Nast long ago. They're the tired ones.

This sounds like something Louis Rossmann should cover as a counter-example of mfgrs trying to do the right thing but fickle, corporate reviewers behaving in a petty, unfair manner.

dgreensp · 20 days ago
I think people are missing the fact that Wired has been about “vibes” since the beginning.

Wired vs. tired is literally about what’s “cool.” That’s it. It has never been rigorous about anything.

dgreensp commented on Perplexity is using stealth, undeclared crawlers to evade no-crawl directives   blog.cloudflare.com/perpl... · Posted by u/rrampage
zarzavat · 21 days ago
If you allow Googlebot to crawl your website and train Gemini, but you don't allow smaller AI companies to do the same thing, then you're contributing to Google's hegemony. Given that AI is likely to be an increasingly important part of society in the future, that kind of discrimination is anti-social. I don't want a future where everything is run by Google even more than it currently is.

Crawling is legal. Training is presumably legal. Long may the little guys do both.

dgreensp · 21 days ago
Googlebot respects robots.txt. And Google doesn't use the fetched data from users of Chrome to supplement their search index (as a2128 is speculating that Perplexity might do when they fetch pages on the user's behalf).
dgreensp commented on I do not remember my life and it's fine   aethermug.com/posts/i-do-... · Posted by u/mrcgnc
dgreensp · 3 months ago
I met someone with SDAM who described it in a more striking way.

He said he doesn’t have any “first-person” memories. Most people, even if they forget most things they do day-to-day, and don’t have great “indices” of their memories, can think back on certain times where they remember being there, doing a thing, probably with some visuals associated with that, which can be played back. This person said that none of the things they remember that they did, they can remember personally doing, if that makes sense.

For me, I have scattered samples, like once in a while throughout my life, my brain sort of takes a snapshot and forms a memory. I can imagine myself back in each place I lived, for example, or each place I worked, or graduating from college, or walking on the beach.

dgreensp commented on Evolving OpenAI's Structure   openai.com/index/evolving... · Posted by u/rohitpaulk
stego-tech · 4 months ago
That world never existed. Yes, pockets did - IT professionals with broadband lines and spare kit hosting IRC servers and phpBB forums from their homes free of charge, a few VC-funded companies offering idealistic visions of the net until funding ran dry (RIP CoHost) - but once the web became privatized, it was all in service of the bottom line by companies. Web 2.0 onwards was all about centralization, surveillance, advertising, and manipulation of the populace at scale - and that intent was never really a secret to those who bothered to pay attention. While the world was reeling from Cambridge Analytica, us pre-1.0 farts who cut our teeth on Telnet and Mosaic were just kind of flabbergasted that ya'll were surprised by overtly obvious intentions.

That doesn't mean it has to always be this way, though. Back when I had more trust in the present government and USPS, I mused on how much of a game changer it might be for the USPS to provide free hosting and e-mail to citizens, repurposing the glut of unused real estate into smaller edge compute providers. Everyone gets a web server and 5GB of storage, with 1A Protections letting them say and host whatever they like from their little Post Office Box. Everyone has an e-mail address tied to their real identity, with encryption and security for digital mail just like the law provides for physical mail. I still think the answer is about enabling more people to engage with the internet on their selective terms (including the option of disengagement), rather than the present psychological manipulation everyone engages in to keep us glued to our screens, tethered to our phones, and constantly uploading new data to advertisers and surveillance firms alike.

But the nostalgic view that the internet used to be different is just that: rose-tinted memories of a past that never really existed. The first step to fixing this mess is acknowledging its harm.

dgreensp · 4 months ago
I don’t think the parent was saying that everyone’s intentions were pure until recently, but rather that naked greed wasn’t cool before, but now it is.

The Internet has changed a lot over the decades, and it did used to be different, with the differences depending on how many years you go back.

dgreensp commented on Corporation for Public Broadcasting Statement Regarding Executive Order   cpb.org/pressroom/Corpora... · Posted by u/coloneltcb
agloe_dreams · 4 months ago
Heh...it is so much worse than that.

Trump has no idea what he is doing, it has been very clear in interviews.

In the first admin, it was the adults in the room, the thing is, it's not yes men this time...it's the villians in the room. Trump is being handed EOs that he doesn't have a clue about.

For all the talk about P2025 and denial of any relation to it, they have done roughly 50% of the actions in the project already with more on the way. ~2/3rds of all his EOs have been in the plan. Virtually everyone related to the project is now in the admin - the head of the FCC literally wrote the 'FCC' section and boy is it an attack on everything the EFF holds dear.

I think what is notable is that it seems to have gotten more bold - the plan called for reducing USAID, not killing it for example.

And Yes, page 246, killing funding for PBS.

dgreensp · 4 months ago
Exactly. Trump is practically illiterate and is being handed things to sign. His original ideas that were pushed back on by his advisors in his first term were a different sort of idea, things like, "Why can't we just force that country to do what we want, we're the USA, we're the most powerful, we could just bomb them."
dgreensp commented on All four major web browsers are about to lose 80% of their funding   danfabulich.medium.com/al... · Posted by u/dfabulich
asimpleusecase · 4 months ago
Seems clear they have not been investing much of that 18B on Safari. Wow, can you imagine what Safari would be if Apple had invested a large fraction of that income on Safari?
dgreensp · 4 months ago
Yeah, it's a funny argument because while Apple has certainly put a lot of money into WebKit and JavaScriptCore over the years in absolute terms, they already don't prioritize Safari or treat web technologies as an alternative to native app development.
dgreensp commented on Kermit: A typeface for kids   microsoft.design/articles... · Posted by u/nmcfarl
MikeTheGreat · 4 months ago
Is this open / free / something we can download and try out?

I did a super-brief search on the page but "download" didn't turn up any results. Does anyone else know where we can download this from?

dgreensp · 4 months ago
I don’t think it’s anything we get to use. All it says is if you are interested in the font, you can contact the company that made it. It’s weird. Sometimes these announcements are more like, “We commissioned this cool thing and made it free,” like when Microsoft came out with their latest emojis.
dgreensp commented on Meta claims torrenting pirated books isn't illegal without proof of seeding   arstechnica.com/tech-poli... · Posted by u/isaacfrond
wrs · 6 months ago
AFAIK, in the US it’s literally about copying. In fact, case law mostly supports the position that just the act of copying a program from disk into memory to run it is protected by copyright (with some statutory exceptions). (Google “RAM copy doctrine”.)
dgreensp · 6 months ago
That’s my understanding as well. Duplicating the bytes of a file when you don’t have the rights to the content is technically infringement and grounds for an infringement claim, and then you have to explain in court why it’s “fair use.”

u/dgreensp

KarmaCake day3376April 10, 2007
About
David Greenspan
View Original