Readit News logoReadit News
detaro commented on Helldivers 2 devs slash install size from 154GB to 23GB   tomshardware.com/video-ga... · Posted by u/doener
stanac · 11 days ago
Off topic question.

> I imagine 90%+ is peered or hosted inside ISPs, not via transit

How hosting inside ISPs function? Does ISP have to MITM? I heard similar claims for Netflix and other streaming media, like ISPs host/cache the data themselves. Do they have to have some agreement with Steam/Netflix?

detaro · 11 days ago
The CDN/content provider ships servers to the ISP which puts them into their network. The provider is just providing connectivity and not involved on a content-level, so no MITM etc needed.
detaro commented on Okta's NextJS-0auth troubles   joshua.hu/ai-slop-okta-ne... · Posted by u/ramimac
rikafurude21 · 24 days ago
I'm more confused by the fact that the OP freely submits a PR into an open source repo but then wants to use "copyright" because the code he submitted ended up being used under the wrong name, which was then corrected.
detaro · 24 days ago
Why is it confusing to you to expect attribution?
detaro commented on I Worked All over Silicon Valley. This Is How It Lost Its Spine   nytimes.com/2025/11/12/op... · Posted by u/Chinjut
Chinjut · a month ago
Oh, I didn't realize there was a threshold. What is the threshold?
detaro · a month ago
I don't know the exact threshold the software uses, but my impression is that the mods use something in the ballpark of <20 points and <5 comments?
detaro commented on I Worked All over Silicon Valley. This Is How It Lost Its Spine   nytimes.com/2025/11/12/op... · Posted by u/Chinjut
Chinjut · a month ago
Ah, it turns out this is a dupe of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45903670. (I thought the submission process used to catch such dupes? The title and URL match exactly.)
detaro · a month ago
6 upvotes and no comments isn't enough attention to trigger dupe direction.
detaro commented on Zig is so cool, C is cooler   github.com/little-book-of... · Posted by u/tamnd
tamnd · a month ago
I added some sentences at the top, so it wont waste people's time:

Some parts of this article were refined with help from LLMs to improve clarity and technical accuracy. These are just personal notes, but I would really appreciate feedback: feel free to share your thoughts, open an issue, or send a pull request!

If you prefer to read only fully human-written articles, feel free to skip this one.

detaro · a month ago
It clearly wasn't "refined" using LLMs when it contained commands that plainly don't work. Don't lie.
detaro commented on End of Japanese community   support.mozilla.org/en-US... · Posted by u/phantomathkg
Seattle3503 · a month ago
The tenor of criticism Firefox/Moz gets is akin to the purity testing that happens in some ideological space.
detaro · a month ago
Not wrong, but that comes with promoting yourself on ideology grounds. If you want support because you are the plucky underdog community project that cares about people and are running ad campaigns how you are not evil big tech, then don't be surprised if people hold you to it. Mozilla is in this weird space where it wants to be both the good little guys and a proper Silicon Valley tech company, and those don't necessarily mix well.
detaro commented on End of Japanese community   support.mozilla.org/en-US... · Posted by u/phantomathkg
bfkwlfkjf · a month ago
What actually happened? What's his complaint?
detaro · a month ago
How did you read the post and miss the complaint?
detaro commented on End of Japanese community   support.mozilla.org/en-US... · Posted by u/phantomathkg
apexalpha · a month ago
I don't know the original author but as a non-native speaker I guess I miss the cultural connotation surrounding "hop on a call".

Doesn't seem weird to me, seems apt to ask to escalate the method of communication when a serious issue like this arises.

Would you consider it more respectful to deal with this issue just by posting in the thread?

detaro · a month ago
It's a community matter posted in a public place, a non-statement with an immediate attempt to direct it to private conversation reads like trying to avoid attention to your mistakes (e.g. hypothetically you don't have to public admit you didn't do anything to check for guidelines to follow). More vibe-y, it all sounds very corporate, like any PR statement in response to criticism ever, or a manager writing to an employee in a big corp, not "humans working together in a community, and one of the humans is clearly pissed off right now".

Also while it's phrased as a question, it doesn't offer any alternative next step. So a better approach would be writing down the initial questions you have and then offer that you'd be open for a call if the OP prefers that. If they don't, they can immediately engage with your questions, and they are open to everybody else in the community. Whereas right now if they say "no, I don't want to call you" that's all you've given them.

(To be clear I can easily believe the writer of the response is not intending any of that and means well, but that's how it comes across)

u/detaro

KarmaCake day41994November 27, 2014View Original