Readit News logoReadit News
delaminator commented on Ask HN: Do you write a technical doc first or just vibe code?    · Posted by u/brihati
delaminator · 12 hours ago
I chat with Claude about viability, capability, existing solutions, alternative approaches, etc.

This helps me get an idea of what we’re doing. I get pushback and have to be clear and Opus is good at asking questions.

Then I get it to write a set of documents for Claude Code describing the vision, the solution, the technical choices, the testing plan, the validation approach, how to share with colleagues, future ideas and a table of contents.

delaminator commented on OpenAI are quietly adopting skills, now available in ChatGPT and Codex CLI   simonwillison.net/2025/De... · Posted by u/simonw
Sammi · a day ago
I'm kinda confused about why this even is something that we need an extra feature for when it's basically already built in to the agentic development feature. I just keep a folder of md files and I add whatever one is relevant when it's relevant. It's kinda straight forward to do...

Just like you I don't edit much in these files on my own. Mostly just ask the model to update an md file whenever I think we've figured out something new, so the learning sticks. I have files for test writing, backend route writing, db migration writing, frontend component writing etc. Whenever a section gets too big to live in agents.md it gets it's own file.

delaminator · 14 hours ago
It’s a formalisation of the method, and it’s in your global ~/.claude and also per project.

I have mine in a GitHub template so I can even use them in Claude Code for the web. And synchronise them across my various machine (which is about 6 machines atm).

delaminator commented on OpenAI are quietly adopting skills, now available in ChatGPT and Codex CLI   simonwillison.net/2025/De... · Posted by u/simonw
mehdibl · a day ago
This is killing me with complexity. We had agents.md and were supposed to augment the context there. Now back to cursor rules and another md file to ingest.
delaminator · a day ago
I tell Claude to make its own skills. “Which part of this task is worth making a skill for, use your skill making skill to do it”
delaminator commented on OpenAI are quietly adopting skills, now available in ChatGPT and Codex CLI   simonwillison.net/2025/De... · Posted by u/simonw
lacker · a day ago
I'm not sure if I have the right mental model for a "skill". It's basically a context-management tool? Like a skill is a brief description of something, and if the model decides it wants the skill based on that description, then it pulls in the rest of whatever amorphous stuff the skill has, scripts, documents, what have you. Is this the right way to think about it?
delaminator · a day ago
Claude Code is not very good at “remembering” its skills.

Maybe they get compacted out of the context.

But you can call upon them manually. I often do something like “using your Image Manipulation skill, make the icons from image.png”

Or “use your web design skill to create a design for the front end”

Tbh i do like that.

I also get Claude to write its own skills. “Using what we learned about from this task, write a skill document called /whatever/using your writing skills skill”

I have a GitHub template including my skills and commands, if you want to see them.

https://github.com/lawless-m/claude-skills

delaminator commented on A “frozen” dictionary for Python   lwn.net/SubscriberLink/10... · Posted by u/jwilk
quietbritishjim · 2 days ago
True, but the original comment that we're talking about here (by sundarurfriend) just mentioned an LLM's output in passing as part of their (presumably) human-written comment. Nothing you've linked to prohibits that.
delaminator · 2 days ago
Presaging your bot produced comment with "A bot said this" is not human written
delaminator commented on GPT-5.2   openai.com/index/introduc... · Posted by u/atgctg
michaelscott · 2 days ago
A lot of mechanisation, especially in the modern world, is not deterministic and is not always 100% right; it's a fundamental "physics at scale" issue, not something new to LLMs. I think what happened when they first appeared was that people immediately clung to a superintelligence-type AI idea of what LLMs were supposed to do, then realised that's not what they are, then kept going and swung all the way over to "these things aren't good at anything really" or "if they only fix this ONE issue I have with them, they'll actually be useful"
delaminator · 2 days ago
That's why I said tend to zero error. I'm a Six Sigma guy. We take accurate over precise.
delaminator commented on Programmers and software developers lost the plot on naming their tools   larr.net/p/namings.html... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
necovek · 2 days ago
Even GNU is a recursive acronym, Emacs a convoluted one... What's Perl, Python, Java... all about? Remember how JavaScript was named? Don't mention Go (go-lang) or Pascal... Git, Mercurial, CVS anyone?

I believe this makes much ado about nothing.

delaminator · 2 days ago
The 2000s Plan9 community asserts "Gnu is Not Useful" as the correct expansion.
delaminator commented on GPT-5.2   openai.com/index/introduc... · Posted by u/atgctg
mac-attack · 2 days ago
I can't understand why people would trust a CEO that regularly lies about product timelines, product features, his own personal life, etc. And that's before politicizing his entire kingdom by literally becoming a part of government and one of the larger donations of the current administration.
delaminator · 2 days ago
You’re not narrowing it down.
delaminator commented on GPT-5.2   openai.com/index/introduc... · Posted by u/atgctg
kyletns · 2 days ago
For the record, brains are also not free of hallucinations.
delaminator · 2 days ago
That’s not a very useful observation though is it?

The purpose of mechanisation is to standardise and over the long term reduce errors to zero.

Otoh “The final truth is there is no truth”

delaminator commented on A “frozen” dictionary for Python   lwn.net/SubscriberLink/10... · Posted by u/jwilk
acdha · 3 days ago
This place hates laziness and imprecision. Using ChatGPT for editing or inspiration is okay as long as you personally review the results for accuracy and completeness, at which point people care about it as much as you announcing that you used a spell checker.
delaminator · 3 days ago
Pasting chat GPT responses is against the site rules.

always has been even before GPT

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46206457

u/delaminator

KarmaCake day190September 25, 2025View Original