This feels like another area where piracy will surely be superior in case things like this land on the disallowed side of regulation. The model trained on all data will outperform the model trained on a legal subset of data. Whether or not you use it to produce potentially infringing content is another point. Performance will likely improve from having references to copyrighted material and people capable of doing so, myself included, would probably prefer to interact with the non limited model. Perhaps time to update the laws or at least move liability from the creator of the model to the user. No one is going after pencil makers but I can draw a pretty good Mickey Mouse with access to one. Feels like me generating C3P0 and claiming ownership is my problem, not OpenAIs.
Readit Newsdawnim commented on Things are about to get worse for generative AI garymarcus.substack.com/p... · Posted by u/eddyzh
Perhaps a valuable public service should be owned and governed by...the public? In a corporation like Twitter, only people who can afford a financial stake have a say, and having more financial stake means having more say. Not a great structure if your concern is power. Perhaps everyone in the public (with a social rather than financial stake in a platform like Twitter) should have a voice in its governance.
Would be interesting to see something like this governed by a community. Interesting in the light of DAO ownership. Any notable projects like this?
Except a Roomba is much more limited than a human maid even in the constrained task of vacuuming the floor. And for a self-driving car you do need human levels of performance. Nor can you cheat and redo the infrastructure to accommodate simpler system like with home automation (ie: replace light switches withe relays).
Except that you could most definitely repurpose some infrastructure to better suit AD. Having a somewhat protected AD only lane in cities would allow, today even, autonomous transport to be utilized.