Readit News logoReadit News
davikr commented on Paracetamol disrupts early embryogenesis by cell cycle inhibition   academic.oup.com/humrep/a... · Posted by u/XzetaU8
propter_hoc · 21 hours ago
Yes, you need to take it with food, but it won't cause liver failure.
davikr · 20 hours ago
Yeah, but on the long-term it will cause kidney injury.
davikr commented on Paracetamol disrupts early embryogenesis by cell cycle inhibition   academic.oup.com/humrep/a... · Posted by u/XzetaU8
thisislife2 · 21 hours ago
Yes, in most cases. Or are you specifically asking about Paracetamol?
davikr · 20 hours ago
For paracetamol intoxication, there is n-acetylcysteine.
davikr commented on Paracetamol disrupts early embryogenesis by cell cycle inhibition   academic.oup.com/humrep/a... · Posted by u/XzetaU8
moritzwarhier · 20 hours ago
Interesting how you put metamizole at #1 for long-term treatment. As far as my experience goes, many doctors do the same in Germany. On the other hand, I've heard that the medication is banned in many other countries.

I guess the safest way is to take up the treatment in a hospital, to check for immediate bad reactions.

On the other hand, like with many medications, severe allergies and individual sensibilities causing side effects often don't show up often in the short term, but rather suddenly after many dose intakes.

So I'm back where I started. Not disagreeing with what you say. It seems like these non-steroidal pain relief medications are poorly understood regarding their interaction with the whole body though.

Many OTC medications and even some prescribed ones (especially psychiatric medications) suffer from a very poor understanding and apparent lack of effort in improving the understanding of their mechanisms of action.

davikr · 20 hours ago
Metamizole is safe to take on the long-term, which is not the case for NSAIDs (nephrotoxic) and corticosteroids.
davikr commented on The issue of anti-cheat on Linux (2024)   tulach.cc/the-issue-of-an... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
shmerl · 3 days ago
TL;DR: Malware level / kernel invasive anti cheats idea that relies on some opaque anti-user blobs is conceptually incompatible with Linux and open source in general.

Proponents of such junk can get lost with their fake justifications of why kernel level anti-cheat malware should be acceptable. They should instead work on server side anti-cheats.

davikr · 3 days ago
haven't seen this done properly in a FPS yet.
davikr commented on The issue of anti-cheat on Linux (2024)   tulach.cc/the-issue-of-an... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
jeroenhd · 3 days ago
> Vanguard did end up banning those people eventually, since it can see what devices you have plugged in.

Only because the makers of those DMA cards do a bad job hiding themselves. They either use vague, recognisable names, or don't act like the devices they're spoofing.

The moment a cheat developer manages to reprogram an actual SSD (especially a common model), hardware detection like that becomes near impossible.

davikr · 3 days ago
Riot just shipped a new kind of DMA protection, using IOMMU, and they tout that that cheating method is now 6 feet deep.

Deleted Comment

Deleted Comment

u/davikr

KarmaCake day6935January 16, 2020View Original