Or is Microsoft just buying power from the plant's owner on the energy market?
Or is Microsoft just buying power from the plant's owner on the energy market?
There already is, though - study hard!
When the news broke about the perpetrators behind Mirai and specifically the Dyn attack, I was shocked that such a high-impact attack originated from one of my classmates in the CS department.
I think EV adoption will eventually plateau until we solve overnight charging for cars parked on city streets or there is a large increase in rapid charging availability and speed.
I'm a blockchain minimalist, but I'd say that there are at least 2 other reasons why blockchains are interesting:
1) A trustless, distributed digital ledger.
But it turns out that _in most cases_, we are OK with a trusted, centralized, institutional clearing agent that maintains the ledger. The benefits are numerous as long as we trust the institution/agent.
2) An immutable record of transactions.
This follows (1), though: if you trust the institution, you trust that there won't be a malicious mutation of your records and in general, because the records are mutable, they can also easily canceled or reversed which also turns out to be generally beneficial.
So I do think blockchains do have some unique use cases where they would be beneficial (e.g. I think property (land, home, car) titles is a good one, car accident/repair history), but there are just way too many where they add no value.
So you can never truly remove trust. I'm not sure a immutable ledger is any more useful than a database if there is still some sort of required trust component.
The author is suggesting the first "movement" was the "browser era, the social-media era, and the smartphone-app-economy era".
It seems they think the next era will vaguely have something to do with AI.
What do HN'ers think the next "movement" will be (if any)?
You’re telling me that you’d rather this was done by a stressed, emotional, tired front-line private?
Reminds me of the debate about a self driving car that might need to mount the curb to avoid hitting a car - and therefore endangering a pedestrian.
It’s not an easy decision but I’d rather a machine made it than a stressed person!
At the end of the day, it's still humans deploying these weapon systems and accepting the risk that they might cause unintended casualties.