Readit News"CEO creates low-effort bug report" -> "CEO uses the low-effort bug report as a starting point to further refine the report and eventually fix the issue in his company's product"
Their slop issues do not actually have value because the fixes based on the slop are equal in their sloppiness.
Author could instead create these slop issues in a place where external contributors can't see them instead of shitting on the contributors for not reading their mind.
Really bizarre lack of self awareness. How do the internal contributors deal with the slop? I wonder what they say about this person in private.
Ignoring AI for a moment: I don't expect anyone to be able to write a design-doc from my own random notes about a problem. They are semi-formed, disconnected ideas that need a lot of refinement. I know that and I have plans around them and know much more context, but if some random person were to take them the outcome would be very bad, or at least require a lot more effort.
A random person has very little chance of being successful with that.
This issue is very similar, only with some AI tools intermediating the notes.
They could stop all the scraping by providing a downloadable data bundle like Wikipedia.
The data bundle doesn't help that at all.
Multi-user that plausibly looks like single-user to three letter agencies?
Not even close.
(The house was ordered to be demolished, but the owner and the builder reached a confidential settlement and the house is still standing to this day)
It seems very likely to me that they would have said something about this theory if it were relevant.
Google just that it was necessary and possible, not that it would be easy. I suspect that many other up-the-stack adventures by other companies were similar.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compilers:_Principles,_Techniq...
It’s focused on theory and very heavy on parsing. All of that is fine, but not especially useful for the hobbies.