Few tears will be shed for Massimo (or Qualcomm) but the next victim could be a much smaller company, maybe one that would be more of a competitor. I don't like the current patent regime but I do believe enforcement should apply to everyone, not just players who lack the money to rig the game.
The hilarious thing about this subthread is that it's already getting filled with hyper-technical but wrong alternative explanations by people eager to show that they know more than the robot.
Sensor Scott opposes the blanket ban because insider trading is already illegal, and thus the ban makes punishable otherwise entirely legal behavior. And he's right- it isn't, and shouldn't be, illegal or considered wrong to be successful, if done the right way.
There's a middle ground somewhere in there I'm sure, but given how suspiciously well some members of Congress have done, and how there's been seemingly not enough accountability of it, I'm not terribly empathetic.
https://www.newsweek.com/stock-act-congress-violations-tradi...
Making the rules simpler will make it easier to comply. Removing the incentive for insider trades strikes me as a good thing.
https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/14/politics/noaa-nominee-accuwea...
I have tried to find a good comparison between the two, but I find it hard to have a clear opinion on which one is best for me.