Dead Comment
It was this fully automated airport, where the checkin is self serviced and you only interact with computers.
Eventually, when I inserted my boarding pass I had a printed piece of paper back that said that they had to change my seat from aisle to midseat
I then tried to find someone to talk to the entire way, but computers can only interact in the way the UI was designed, and no programmer accounted or cared for my scenario
The ground attendant couldn't have done anything of course because it wasn't part of the scope of her job, and this was the part of germany where nice was not one of their stereotypes.
Eventually I got a survey a week later about a different leg of the flight, so could I really complain there? that one was fine? I had a paranoid wonder if that was intentional
So this might be the reason you had to change seats.
I know people will say pick up a cheap Android phone. And perhaps they're right, but Android is not simple. It has so many things going on that you just can't write a C program and start playing with it. You have to learn a dozen Android quirks and deal with the Android operating system.
Is there something where you can just upload a program to flash and the device just boots into the program and you start playing?
xterm (389-1)
alacritty (0.13.1-1)
kitty-tuned (0.31.0-1)
zutty (0.14-2)
st (master 95f22c5)
urxvt (9.31-4)
konsole (24.02.0-1)
kitty (0.31.0-1)
wezterm (20230712.072601)
gnome-terminal (3.50.1-1)
xfce4-terminal (1.1.1-2)
terminator (2.1.3-3)
tilix (1.9.6-3)
hyper (v3.4.1)
I only tested for software latency (monitor, keyboard and other hardware latency is not included in Typometer benchmarks). I ran the test on Arch Linux with Xorg + bswpwm without compositor. You can find the full results on by blog https://beuke.org/terminal-latency/.https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD06xx/E...
Edit: To add on this, I think there is a lot of software that is written in a throwaway fashion (CRUD apps, shell scripts), where using LLMs might beneficial. But anything where correctness actually matters, why would I describe it in natural language only to then check the implementation?
The much more sensible use of LLMs to me is the other way round: creating ad hoc documentation for code that you can even ask questions. But that's probably not fundable by VCs on the same level.
[^1]: https://gokrazy.org/
The fix described in this post have been submitted as a patch to the official Git project. The fix is improving a legitimate inefficiency in Git, and does nothing towards "embracing", "extending", or "extinguishing" anything.
I'm not saying this shouldn't be merged, but I think people should be aware and see the early signs.