Readit News logoReadit News
chadcmulligan commented on IBM to acquire Confluent   confluent.io/blog/ibm-to-... · Posted by u/abd12
notepad0x90 · 10 days ago
This is so fascinating to me. I mean how IBM keeps taking over other companies, but they consistently deliver low quality/bottom-tier services and products. Why do they keep doing the same thing again and again? How are they generating actual revenue this way?

Ok, so does anyone remember 'Watson'? It was the chatgpt before chatgpt. they built it in house. Why didn't they compete with OpenAI like Google and Anthropic are doing, with in-house tools? They have a mature PowerPC (Power9+? now?)setup, lots of talent to make ML/LLMs work and lots of existing investment in datacenters and getting GPU-intense workloads going.

I don't disagree that this acquisition is good strategy, I'm just fascinated (Schadenfreude?) to witness the demise of confluent now. I think economists should study this, it might help avert larger problems.

chadcmulligan · 10 days ago
Have you seen Office Space? I'm sure it was based on IBM
chadcmulligan commented on New magnetic component discovered in the Faraday effect   phys.org/news/2025-11-mag... · Posted by u/rbanffy
namanyayg · 25 days ago
We intuitively think in particles and see a world of billiard balls colliding with one another.

But actually everything is merely waves and fields.

There's going to be a time where humans finally reconcile the quantum with the newtonian -- and I can't wait for that day

chadcmulligan · 25 days ago
I don't have the math, but doesn't quantum field theory say this?
chadcmulligan commented on Microsoft AI CEO pushes back against critics after recent Windows AI backlash   windowscentral.com/micros... · Posted by u/thewebguyd
chadcmulligan · a month ago
A quote I saw today: "Maybe AI seems like a creative solution, if you aren't a creative person.", seems to explain a lot of this maybe.

Edit: Found the source: https://www.eurogamer.net/maybe-ai-is-a-creative-solution-if...

chadcmulligan commented on Solving a million-step LLM task with zero errors   arxiv.org/abs/2511.09030... · Posted by u/Anon84
adastra22 · a month ago
Why not? That's basically how NASA manages large projects.
chadcmulligan · a month ago
IBM tried that with CMM (capability maturity model), it didn't work, the problem is NASA knows what they're building, rockets and satellites don't have any grey areas and everything is specified. Other things are less well defined, and the people specifying aren't rocket scientists.
chadcmulligan commented on The surprising benefits of giving up   nautil.us/the-surprising-... · Posted by u/jnord
marcelr · a month ago
by far the most helpful realization i had in the last decade was that i have severe limitations, and i have to give up constantly until i find the path of least resistance
chadcmulligan · a month ago
Buddhists call it the middle way - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Way
chadcmulligan commented on Software development in the time of strange new angels   davegriffith.substack.com... · Posted by u/calosa
dwohnitmok · a month ago
Maybe. I have a fair amount of uncertainty about the speed of AI development but I think that that is well within the realm of possibility (and definitely a possibility developers should be considering). Note that even if AI replaces an entire dev team, it's still not apparent that the process would be as easy as you're saying (at least for a while after that), since after all even with a crack dev team products are almost never as easy "make me this product" "okay!" and then the product is created.

But that wasn't what I was trying to get at. My point is that this is what the author was predicting, and if that were to pass, that is more or less the death of software development as a profession, contrary to what the author says when he says "I'm not going to do that, because I absolutely don't believe it."

chadcmulligan · a month ago
Indeed, but if we reach that point then we've probably got AGI, so not really much to worry about. Is there a point where AI can replace entire software dev teams, but nothing else? ie not quite AGI, seems unlikely, if you ask a product manager, they'd say Impossible! I look forward to the singularity, but I don't think this is it sadly. LLM's are a neat tool, and dev will probably change but I think it's wishful thinking on the part of business folk. the other argument is that LLM's will actually increase the software dev work, cause things that weren't possible now are which is something I find interesting.

The other thing I've been thinking is that most corporates now are mainly software (so it's been said), if thats the case and software becomes cheaper the barrier to entry to compete with corporates lowers, they become ripe for disruption. Insurance comes to mind, same with banking, probably others, search? its already disrupted, new industries will probably arise to - data validation, for example, is going to be an issue in the age of AI. The idea that making web sites for a living for the next century was probably always a very wishful way of thinking, but the idea that software development will disappear is also naive imho. However it's yet to be proved that software dev is cheaper with AI.

chadcmulligan commented on Learn Prolog Now (2006)   lpn.swi-prolog.org/lpnpag... · Posted by u/rramadass
chanux · a month ago
I thoroughly enjoyed doing all the exercises. It was challenging and hence, fun!

I don't think I ever learned how it can be useful other than feeding the mind.

chadcmulligan · a month ago
There was a time when the thinking was you can load all the facts into a prolog engine and it would replace experts like doctors and engineers - expert systems, it didn't work. Now its a curiosity
chadcmulligan commented on Software development in the time of strange new angels   davegriffith.substack.com... · Posted by u/calosa
dwohnitmok · a month ago
> You might be expecting that here is where I would start proclaiming the death of software development.... I'm not going to do that, because I absolutely don't believe it. Agentic AI means that anything you know [how] to code can be coded very rapidly. Read that sentence carefully. If you know just what code needs to be created to solve an issue you want, the angels will grant you that code at the cost of a prompt or two.... for some developers, this revolution is not going to go well. Omelets are being made, which means that eggs will be broken.... Those that succeed in making this transition are going to be those with higher-order skills and larger vision. Those who have really absorbed what it means to be engineers first and computer guys second.... Those that succeed in making this transition are going to need to accept that they are businessmen just as much as they are engineers.

Honestly this just feels like a roundabout way of saying software development is dead (this leaves aside the validity of the point, just to point out a contradiction in the author's message where the author seems to be saying that software development is dead in substance even while denying that at the surface).

Let me rewrite this entirely just using typists, which is a profession that has definitely been killed by technology.

> You might be expecting that here is where I would start proclaiming the death of typists as an industry.... I'm not going to do that, because I absolutely don't believe it. Voice transcription and/or personal computers means that anything you know how to say can be transcribed very rapidly. Read that sentence carefully. If you know just what words needs to be transcribed to solve an issue you want, the angels will grant you that code at the cost of some computer hardware.... for some typists, this revolution is not going to go well. Omelets are being made, which means that eggs will be broken.... Those that succeed in making this transition are going to be those with higher-order skills and larger vision. Those who have really absorbed what it means to be writers first and typing guys second.... Those that succeed in making this transition are going to need to accept that they are businessmen just as much as they are typists.

It still works, but only because of an extremely expansive definition of a "typist" that includes being an actual writer or businessman.

If your definition of "software developer" includes "businessman" I think that's simply too broad a definition to be useful. What the author seems to be saying is that software development will simply become another skill of an all-around businessman via the help of AI rather than a specialized role. Which sure, sounds plausible, but definitely qualifies as the death of software development as a profession in my book, in the same way that personal computers have made transcribing one's words simply another skill of an all-around businessman rather than a specialized role.

(Again leaving aside the question of whether that's going to actually happen. Just saying that the future world the author is talking about is pretty much one where software development is dead.)

chadcmulligan · a month ago
> skill of an all-around businessman

So do you imagine that AI will reach the point that a business guy will say make me a web site to blah blah blah, and the AI will say sure boss and it will appear? Sort of what a dev/team of devs/testers/product managers/BA's would do now? the current batch is a long way from this afaik

chadcmulligan commented on Software development in the time of strange new angels   davegriffith.substack.com... · Posted by u/calosa
williamstein · a month ago
If I hired a software developer a few years ago, I might expect them to do roughly what Claude Code does today on some task (?). If I hired a dev today I would expect much more from them than what Claude Code can currently do.
chadcmulligan · a month ago
Isn't a big part of it knowing what to ask Claude Code - for example I wanted some code to brighten/darken my buttons on mouseover, I asked Claude to make some code to do that, it was a bit wrong, I fixed it. I integrated the code and tested it. Now I know how to do all this, because I've been doing it for years, I could have done it without Claude but it saved me a bit of time.

Now there are a few things I see that affect this

1. The only way Claude knew how to do this is because there was a stack of existing code, but its probably in C, so you could regard Claude as an expert programming language translator.

2. There is no way that Claude could integrate this into my current code base

3. Claude can't create anything new

4. It's often very wrong, and the bigger/more complex the code is, the wronger it gets.

So, what are the areas that Claude excels? it seems that CRUD web app/Web front end is the sweet spot? (not really sure about this - I don't do much web front end work). I write graphics Apps and Claude is handy for those things you'd have to look up and spend some time on, but thats about all.

An example - I asked it to make me some fancy paint brush code (to draw in a painterly style), this is hard, the code that it made was pretty bad, it just used very basic brush styles, and when pressed it went into crazy land.

So my point is - if something exists and its not too hard, Claude is great, if you want something large and complex, then Claude can be a good helper. I really don't see how it can replace a good dev, there are a lot of code monkeys around gluing web sites together that could be replaced but even then they are probably the same people who are vibe coding now.

If you really want some fun ask them to draw a circuit diagram for a simple amplifier, it's almost painful watching them struggle.

chadcmulligan commented on .NET 10   devblogs.microsoft.com/do... · Posted by u/runesoerensen
vintagedave · a month ago
.Net is also good as a platform for other languages. I recently started working with RemObjects, and you can compile languages like Java, Swift, Go and more (VB, Pascal) to .Net. Then, the whole framework and ecosystem is available. I'm liking it a lot.

They have customers who are startups and the 'got to have tools' folk like having lots of languages since they can onboard people who know anything-not-C# and benefit from the .Net library.

chadcmulligan · a month ago
You can also compile to wasm I believe

u/chadcmulligan

KarmaCake day2903January 25, 2016View Original