Readit News logoReadit News
cfmcdonald commented on California passes law to ban ultra-processed foods from school lunches   gov.ca.gov/2025/10/08/gov... · Posted by u/Kaibeezy
chneu · 2 months ago
You're fixating on a singular definition.

A homemade cake is minimally processed. The flour and sugar are processed but nothing that heavily alters it.

A commercial cake on the other hand has stabilizers, ph balancers, etc.

You're over thinking it. Almost nothing made at home is ultra processed unless you're doing some weird sausage making. If you can name the ingredients easily, it probably isn't ultra processed.

cfmcdonald · 2 months ago
I think the GP's point is there is no meaningful nutritional difference between a from-scratch cake and a box cake. Both are pretty unhealthy and should be eaten only as special treats. "Ultra-processed" is not a useful way of separating healthy from unhealthy foods.
cfmcdonald commented on Beginnings: The Dempster Dumpster   classicrefusetrucks.com/a... · Posted by u/pcaharrier
pcaharrier · 2 months ago
I'm also cringing a little bit to learn that the practice of misspelling words with a "K" is as old as the "Dumpster Kolector" from the 1940s.
cfmcdonald · 2 months ago
It looks like the trend started circa the 1920s in the U.S. Kotex (1920) [0], Kleenex (1924) [1], Kool-Aid (1927) [2], Kool (1933) [3], Krispy Kreme (1934) [4].

Kraft might look like one, but isn't, it's named after James Kraft [5], which presumably traces back to the german word Kraft.

I'm curious if there are older examples.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kotex [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleenex [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kool-Aid [3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kool_(cigarette) [4]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krispy_Kreme [5]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_L._Kraft

cfmcdonald commented on Microcomputers – The Second Wave: Toward a Mass Market   technicshistory.com/2025/... · Posted by u/cfmcdonald
gabrielsroka · 2 months ago
> the original Apple Computer (later called the Apple I)

All the original manuals/ads/etc (that I can find online) called it the Apple-1 (Arabic, not Roman). I think Woz was already working on the Apple II by the time the Apple I was released.

cfmcdonald · 2 months ago
Author here. Yes I could be more accurate here. It was called just "Apple Computer" in some contexts, e.g. this ad [0]. This manual calls it "Apple-1" on the cover [1], but "Apple Computer" in the contents. But you are definitely right that it was often called the Apple-1 in 1976 and into 1977.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_I#/media/File:Apple_1_Ad... [1]: https://s3data.computerhistory.org/brochures/apple.applei.19...

cfmcdonald commented on The Hobby Computer Culture   technicshistory.com/2025/... · Posted by u/cfmcdonald
kens · 7 months ago
I remember the big 1977-1979 scam with DataSync, World Power Systems, and "Colonel David Winthrop" advertising S-100 boards and other computer stuff but not shipping it to purchasers while also ripping off his suppliers. The article mentions Colonel Whitney (not Winthrop) for some reason

Interesting article on it: https://medium.com/@madmedic11671/forgotten-fraud-world-powe...

cfmcdonald · 7 months ago
Author here. Thank you for the reference, this is very helpful. The name "Colonel Whitney" came from a 1984 Stan Veit article: https://www.atariarchives.org/deli/computer_magazine_madness...

Obviously he misremembered the name. I wasn't able to find other references to corroborate more details of the scam, but of course now I know that I wasn't searching for the correct name.

u/cfmcdonald

KarmaCake day1614December 17, 2013View Original