Even OpenAI itself hasn’t resorted to these wild conspiracy theories.
Unless you’re an insider in these companies, you’re just like the rest of us, you know nothing.
Even OpenAI itself hasn’t resorted to these wild conspiracy theories.
Unless you’re an insider in these companies, you’re just like the rest of us, you know nothing.
I deeply apologize for this possibly snarky, irrelevant comment, maybe it shouldn't be allowed. I just wanted to offer my perspective.
And who would 1. Pave your roads 2. Keep you safe 3. Care for you when you’re old 4. Keep the electric grid running 5. Etc
Modern society works because there’s a bunch of people who do things they don’t like.
The alternative is that we all go back to being hunter gatherers.
Amazon apparently pays around $25/hour to its starting warehouse workers. That’s 1k per week for 40 hours per week, or around 4k/month. That’s more than what French government pays its rocket scientists. People can discover their market rates based on their skills, and are free to work for another employer. There is no lock down.
I was about to call bullshit but then looked up the average salary for an aeronautical engineer in France and it was… bleak.
Dead Comment
1. The most popular front-end frameworks (e.g. React and Angular) are created by large orgs which naturally leads to extensive codebases as they’ll need to have many use cases.
2. Every new and shiny front-end framework is good for job security since having it on a resume makes you more hireable. I suspect it’s also why some developers practically force startups to switch their front-end codebase to the next shiny framework - resume padding.
As a solo dev I wasted a few years using (and hating) these new frameworks for my Django projects because it’s what everyone was recommending.
Then it hit me when I realized that they were meant for large dedicated front-end teams to increase their productivity. If you’re a solo developer, they actually hurt your productivity.
That’s why I’m so happy with htmx. I can get my sanity back!
why is that surprising? nobody really agrees on what the threshold for AGI is, and if you break it down:
is it artificial? yes.
is it general? yes. you can ask it questions across almost any domain.
is it intelligent? yes. like people say things like "my dog is intelligent" (rightly so). well is chatgpt more intelligent than a dog? yeah. hell it might give many undergrads a run for their money.
a literal reading suggests agi is here. any claim to the negative is either homocentrism or just vibes.
When I tell an LLM to count to 10 with a 2 second pause between each count all it does is generate Python code with a sleep function. Why is that?
A 3 year old can understand that question and follow those instructions. An LLM doesn’t have an innate understanding of time it seems.
Can we really call it AGI if that’s the case?
That’s just one example.