Exactly. This flawed argument by which everything will be fixed by future models drives me crazy every time.
Just a couple more trillion and 6 more months!
Readit Newsbopbopbop7 commented on Claude’s C Compiler vs. GCC harshanu.space/en/tech/cc... · Posted by u/unchar1
bopbopbop7 commented on Claude’s C Compiler vs. GCC harshanu.space/en/tech/cc... · Posted by u/unchar1
I don't feel that I see this anywhere but if so, I guess I'm in a third camp.
I am "pro" in the sense that I believe that LLM's are making traditional programming obsolete. In fact there isn't any doubt in my mind.
However, I am "anti" in the sense that I am not excited or happy about it at all! And I certainly don't encourage anyone to throw money at accelerating that process.
> I believe that LLM's are making traditional programming obsolete. In fact there isn't any doubt in my mind.
Is this what AI psychosis looks like? How can anyone that is a half decent programmer actually believe that English + non-deterministic code generator will replace "traditional" programming?
Deleted Comment
Deleted Comment
Ah, it couldn't generate a 100% complete working browser from scratch in a week. I guess the technology is cooked.
Ah, so no longer misinformation?
Deleted Comment
Deleted Comment
> AI misinformation? Please do provide some examples.
Like saying they can't generate compiling code in this very thread?
Go look at the 40k failing CI/CD runs on the famous cursor browser.
AI misinformation? Please do provide some examples.
Your whole history is AI psychosis btw, seek help.
What coding agent are you using where the code doesn't even compile!?
The one that cursor used to build their famous browser.