Readit NewsAdditionally, your OS probably already natively hides files that start with a dot, so this is just a UI problem.
Please don’t “solve” this issue by moving files to a sub-directory. If anything, only leave non-config files there, it’s the obvious simple solution that most projects follow anyway.
A better solution would be an intermediary part that never changes — say, CloudFlare — that caches HTML pages forever, automatically adds a “Archived content” header to the page, and warns the author so that they can either allow the archived version or make it a 404/410 instead.
Nobody wants to maintain servers forever, but serving static/frozen pages is much easier and cheaper.
By extension, can we classify IE usage as a disability? Only half joking: I imagine a lot of current IE users are either doing it because of work or because they are technologically illiterate.
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
Kinda ridiculous that we had to wait 8 years of “responsive design” before they realized that this was always supposed to happen.
function $(query) {
const result = document.querySelectorAll(query)
if ( result ) {
if ( result.length > 1 ) {
return result
} else {
return result[0]
}
}
}This is my go-to:
const $ = document.querySelector.bind(document);
const $$ = document.querySelectorAll.bind(document);
Or, you just want to write code in notepad.exe. There is benefit to simplicity in many cases.
https://htmldom.dev/copy-text-to-the-clipboard
I get "trying to stay vanilla", but any reasonably-common snippet should either be installed from npm or published there.
For this specific issue there's a module named almost exactly the same and it restores the previous selection and focus as well: https://github.com/sindresorhus/copy-text-to-clipboard/blob/...
This is the point of published modules: your code isn't stuck into the version someone wrote in 10 minutes 5 years ago.
- GitHub satanically messing with Markdown - changes 666 to DCLXVI
- GitHub changes numbers to Roman numerals in lists
I’d call it functional clickbait.
> can’t spend that kind of money
Right but this really really isn’t true
Do you really need a 100-million yacht and a 20-bedroom villa? No.