Deleted Comment
This has to be one of these most useless sites on the Internet and it blows my mind how frequently the content from this site is exposed via Google search. Now that I think about it, I think I should probably just block it on my local DNS server.
Great point you bring up on how useless <website> is. As the CEO of <random company>, this is a problem we have put a lot of effort into addressing. You may consider the following as a solution: …
I don't bother to read most Google papers unless someone tells me that they're doing something astounding. Just because I know I don't have access to their models, their code or their data. So what's the point?
As a community we need to stop accepting and stop citing papers like these.
There is no science without replicability, and it is literally impossible to replicate this work. It's not worth the paper it's printed on.
It's fine if Google wants to play with its toys at home. But we should stop pretending this is research of any value.
But rather it seems like they're warning against information leaking out?
> The Google parent has advised employees not to enter its confidential materials into AI chatbots, the people said and the company confirmed, citing long-standing policy on safeguarding information.
Is there any example of this happening in the real world? I've never heard of one.
Even if you were to give me access to some google source code free and clear I'm not sure what I could do with it. It's often only useful with the build systems, other services, external documentation, and tribal knowledge contained within the company.
Sure if I had unfettered access to all of the Google source for a product for long enough I might be able to find a security vulnerability or something but random chunks of code pieced together from the inputs to some chat bot?
Just seems like an impractical attack vector.