Readit News logoReadit News
bendtheblock commented on FTX was registered with and licensed by the CFTC, which failed to regulate FTX   bettermarkets.org/newsroo... · Posted by u/itronitron
TacticalCoder · 3 years ago
The NY Times just ran an article on SBF and doesn't mention the word "fraud" or "crime" once. It looks like daddy and mommy's friends are hard at work here. It's completely surreal.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/14/technology/ftx-sam-bankma...

bendtheblock · 3 years ago
Molly White, David Gerard and a few other academics and researchers did a 'correction' of a recent NY Times fluff piece from March 2022 here.

https://www.mollywhite.net/annotations/latecomers-guide-to-c...

It seems as if NYT have a couple of relatively pro-crypto (or just naive) writers.

bendtheblock commented on The Blockchain in a Historical Perspective   jonstokes.com/p/the-block... · Posted by u/socialdemocrat
Stevvo · 4 years ago
The Libor sandal. That was precisely banks changing their own ledgers to defraud their customers on a massive scale.
bendtheblock · 4 years ago
That was price fixing - nothing to do with the bank's ledger. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/libor-scandal.asp
bendtheblock commented on The Blockchain in a Historical Perspective   jonstokes.com/p/the-block... · Posted by u/socialdemocrat
dcolkitt · 4 years ago
> In recent history have there been examples of banks changing their own ledgers?

Yes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wells_Fargo_account_fraud_scan...

bendtheblock · 4 years ago
That wasn't a change in the ledger - it was the misselling and fraudulent opening of accounts. And it was remediated, there was a change in the leadership and settlements to the victims. You're proving my point, as a system we do a decent job of enforcing good behaviour.
bendtheblock commented on The Blockchain in a Historical Perspective   jonstokes.com/p/the-block... · Posted by u/socialdemocrat
bendtheblock · 4 years ago
A better title would be Ledgers in historical perspective. The hypothetical he ends with (what if ledgers could be decentralised) is a classic example of blockchains looking for a problem. In recent history have there been examples of banks changing their own ledgers? As a civilisation we have already solved the problem of trust in a much more efficient way.
bendtheblock commented on The Lightning Network: Turning Bitcoin into Money   papers.ssrn.com/sol3/pape... · Posted by u/olalonde
bendtheblock · 4 years ago
Due to blockchain's architectural shortcomings, you need to do the transactions off chain. Fine...

But crypto-"currencies" are actually highly speculative assets (as South Africa declared today [1]). No bro will spend them - the ideology is to HODL for 100k remember [2]? Earnest patron saints like Laszlo Hanyecz bought two papa john’s pizzas in 2010 for what would be worth today roughly $200,000,000 [3]. They wanted a new currency, but today the purpose is speculation. The whole point is not to be the greater fool.

Bitcoin was never meant to be gold, it was meant to be spent. But that hasn't happened.

[1] https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-not-a-currency-south-...

[2] https://www.wealthsimple.com/en-ca/magazine/laser-eyes-crypt...

[3] https://www.the-sun.com/news/2935660/bitcoin-pizza-laszlo-ha...

bendtheblock · 4 years ago
what's wrong with this comment?! that it's anti-crypto? currency needs to be a medium of exchange, unit of account, and store of value. Given its volatility, Bitcoin could only ever realistically be useful for the latter, and only then as a risky speculation.
bendtheblock commented on The Lightning Network: Turning Bitcoin into Money   papers.ssrn.com/sol3/pape... · Posted by u/olalonde
varajelle · 4 years ago
It keeps many of the properties of bitcoin:

- decentralised

- trustless

- censure resistance

Edit: - pseudonymous

bendtheblock · 4 years ago
but what's the benefit of these?

- decentralised: why is this good?

- trustless: I trust the companies I use, it works

- censure resistance: OK, fringe case for most

- pseudonymous: why do I want anyone to be able to see my transaction history?

bendtheblock commented on The Lightning Network: Turning Bitcoin into Money   papers.ssrn.com/sol3/pape... · Posted by u/olalonde
bendtheblock · 4 years ago
Due to blockchain's architectural shortcomings, you need to do the transactions off chain. Fine...

But crypto-"currencies" are actually highly speculative assets (as South Africa declared today [1]). No bro will spend them - the ideology is to HODL for 100k remember [2]? Earnest patron saints like Laszlo Hanyecz bought two papa john’s pizzas in 2010 for what would be worth today roughly $200,000,000 [3]. They wanted a new currency, but today the purpose is speculation. The whole point is not to be the greater fool.

Bitcoin was never meant to be gold, it was meant to be spent. But that hasn't happened.

[1] https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-not-a-currency-south-...

[2] https://www.wealthsimple.com/en-ca/magazine/laser-eyes-crypt...

[3] https://www.the-sun.com/news/2935660/bitcoin-pizza-laszlo-ha...

bendtheblock commented on Coinbase is reportedly selling geolocation data to ICE   theintercept.com/2022/06/... · Posted by u/rukshn
TrapLord_Rhodo · 4 years ago
That all of those systems are extremely centralized? i don't get your point on this one as it seems to reaffirm my comment.
bendtheblock · 4 years ago
The centralized nature of these oligopolies is a property of capitalism, i.e. capital consolidates power. You are saying that search, storage etc are centralised because of the tech? Why are they any more centralised than the other (pre-internet) examples I mentioned?

u/bendtheblock

KarmaCake day403January 12, 2009
About
anti-crypto, pro web2.0 https://webtwoboomer.com
View Original