Why was there a regulation in place preventing this in the first place? I don’t get it.
Readit Newsatburrow commented on India authorises sale of electric vehicles without batteries electricmotorengineering.... · Posted by u/baybal2
That doesn't seem to check out. Apple announced the first Intel-based iMac and MacBook Pro on January 10, 2006, when AAPL closed at $11.55.
AAPL did have a daily low of $80.86 on December 24, 2013.
You’re not accounting for the 1 to 7 stock split. 7 * 11.55
atburrow commented on How much Americans make in wages howmuch.net/articles/how-... · Posted by u/LiweiZ
I mean, do you want a specific number? Because if you go to the Wikipedia page for "List of US Metropolitan Statistical Areas", you'll see the following
Amarillo TX population: 265,000
NY, LA, CHI, DAL, HOU, DC, MIA: 70,000,000
21.5% is not what I would consider “most of the population”.
atburrow commented on Unity Engine ToS change makes cloud-based SpatialOS games illegal arstechnica.com/gaming/20... · Posted by u/MikusR
Here's a discussion on the Unity forum: https://forum.unity.com/threads/recent-tos-update-blocks-the...
Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18684384
atburrow commented on My phone is spying on me, so I decided to spy on it abc.net.au/news/2018-10-2... · Posted by u/puffl
Don't think such an app would be accepted by Apple. Why are using iPhone if you want ownership over your device?
This is a naive response I see given to iPhone users when they ask about how to get a certain feature. It’s obvious no research was put into this answer as a sibling comment to yours clearly helped out by suggesting Charles proxy which is now available natively on iOS.
I can't imagine that 100% of the people interested in fortnite for android are willing to sideload the apk. I would be surprised if this wasn't having a net-negative impact on the total number of android users. I wonder if this is just to avoid paying a percentage on in-app purchases? What else could it be?
I'm sure Epic doesn't mind given their savings of staying out of Google Play.
Deleted Comment
I would agree if I felt it made security stronger. I don't feel that way, given I know now that satellite is likely running windows.
OSS serving as a basis, not the end-implementation of a system is how it would work in practice. Just like it does now with contracted vendors.