Are you still doing healthcare back office automation? Would love to learn why you pivoted out if not, happy to DM as well
Readit Newsasdev commented on Launch HN: BrowserBook (YC F24) – IDE for deterministic browser automation · Posted by u/cschlaepfer
Aren't most of the large frontier model providers SOC 2 compliant? I think AWS Bedrock is also SOC 2 compliant. Not sure why you would need to self host anything then as you'll get turnkey secure solutions from the bigger plays
asdev commented on A desktop app for isolated, parallel agentic development github.com/coder/mux... · Posted by u/mercat
Made the same except you get terminal sessions instead of overriding it with a custom UI: https://github.com/built-by-as/FleetCode
asdev commented on Structured outputs on the Claude Developer Platform claude.com/blog/structure... · Posted by u/adocomplete
My playing around with structured output on OpenAI leads me to believe that hardly anyone is using this, or the documentation was horrible. Luckily, they accept Pydantic models, but the idea of manually writing a JSON schema (what the docs teach first) is mind-bending.
Anthropic seems to be following suit.
(I'm probably just bitter because they owe me $50K+ for stealing my books).
it's also really slow to use structured outputs. mainly makes sense for offline use cases
asdev commented on Hacker News Hiring Threads vs. S&P 500 hnhiringstats.streamlit.a... · Posted by u/asdev
asdev commented on Codemaps: Understand Code, Before You Vibe It cognition.ai/blog/codemap... · Posted by u/janpio
you might be surprised how much business context leaks into a codebase and that's plenty to work on :)
https://deepwiki.com/search/vimfnfnname-lets-you-call-neov_e...
but also how much you kinda dont need it when you're just debugging code
https://windsurf.com/codemaps/87532afd-092d-401d-aa3f-0121c7...
agree that AI can kinda infer business context sometimes. in my experience, it doesn't work that well.
a lot of the time, debugging isn't a logic issue, but more of a state exploration issue. hence you need to add logging to see the inputs of what's going on, just seeing a control flow isn't super useful. maybe codemaps could simulate some inputs in a flow which would be super cool, but probably quite hard to do.
asdev commented on Codemaps: Understand Code, Before You Vibe It cognition.ai/blog/codemap... · Posted by u/janpio
> AI will never know the why behind the architecture…
That's true only if you don't provide that context. The answer is: Do provide that context. My experience is that LLM output will be influenced and improved by the why's you provide.
if you know that context, you don't need a codemap
asdev commented on Codemaps: Understand Code, Before You Vibe It cognition.ai/blog/codemap... · Posted by u/janpio
A feature like this isn't useful because knowing what connects to what, dependencies, etc. means nothing without business context. AI will never know the why behind the architecture, it will only take it at face value. I think technical design docs which have some context and reading the code is more than enough. This sits in the middle ground where it lacks the context of a doc and is less detailed than the code.