arcza (u/arcza) - Readit News

arcza commented on I built a free tool to beat ATS after getting auto-rejected 48 times resume-tailor-ai-nine.ver... · Posted by u/satineliu

arcza · an hour ago

The testimonials look so fake and remove all credibility in what may be an interesting product.

Nice you want to level the playing field for candidates, but first impressions != authentic

arcza commented on UK has agreed to drop demand for access to Apple user data, says US ft.com/content/ab0aba27-8... · Posted by u/arcza

arcza · 7 months ago

https://archive.ph/fHhqz

arcza commented on Reddit Ads Is a Scam statuz.gg/blog/reddit-ads... · Posted by u/stewones

ceejayoz · 7 months ago

The footer of userpath.co says "built by @stewones". More than a partner, yes? Your own product?

arcza · 7 months ago

Good spot lol

arcza commented on Reddit Ads Is a Scam statuz.gg/blog/reddit-ads... · Posted by u/stewones

arcza · 7 months ago

Your post was very unconvincing to read and riddled with errors. Rage bait to prop up the Userpath thingy?

arcza commented on Show HN: Legal Eyes – Turn casual text into legalese with one click legaleyes.uk/... · Posted by u/ForgedLabsJames

arcza · 9 months ago

One further point. In the UK - there's an active campaign to use clear plain English in contracts. I don't think making things harder to understand is a good idea, but not saying you're doing this either.

arcza commented on Show HN: Legal Eyes – Turn casual text into legalese with one click legaleyes.uk/... · Posted by u/ForgedLabsJames

arcza · 9 months ago

Hi. Why is a UK website (assuming based on the domain) pricing in USD for a UK viewer? Thanks.

arcza commented on CGNAT frustrates all IP address-based technologies (2019) sidn.nl/en/news-and-blogs... · Posted by u/wofo

superkuh · a year ago

CGNAT providers are not ISPs. They're web service providers, WSP.

arcza · a year ago

"CGNAT providers" is like saying "DHCP providers" or "PPPoE providers". I've never heard of a "WSP". What if I send an email on port 25 (not web) via my "WSP"? LOL.

arcza commented on CGNAT frustrates all IP address-based technologies (2019) sidn.nl/en/news-and-blogs... · Posted by u/wofo

throw0101d · a year ago

(CG)NAT can been a real cost to ISPs, especially smaller ones:

> Our [American Indian] tribal network started out IPv6, but soon learned we had to somehow support IPv4 only traffic. It took almost 11 months in order to get a small amount of IPv4 addresses allocated for this use. In fact there were only enough addresses to cover maybe 1% of population. So we were forced to create a very expensive proxy/translation server in order to support this traffic.

> We learned a very expensive lesson. 71% of the IPv4 traffic we were supporting was from ROKU devices. 9% coming from DishNetwork & DirectTV satellite tuners, 11% from HomeSecurity cameras and systems, and remaining 9% we replaced extremely outdated Point of Sale(POS) equipment. So we cut ROKU some slack three years ago by spending a little over $300k just to support their devices.

* https://community.roku.com/t5/Features-settings-updates/It-s...

* Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35047624

arcza · a year ago

This sounds like incompetence. You can procure IPv4 addresses in days as a monthly rental (go speak to Cogent etc), or even buy outright with little delay. Going rate is currently $34/address at the /24 level and cheaper for larger blocks.