Yes, if you are healthy and active, creatine is safe and proven to be effective.
it wrecks my guts. so, no.
Readit NewsDeleted Comment
ant_li0n commented on Do not download the app, use the website idiallo.com/blog/dont-dow... · Posted by u/foxfired
Most people don't know how to use a computer well. Most people are just slightly above computer-illiterate. They were introduced to phones which have apps. Now in their minds that's how everything must be. Anything else induces fear into their minds.
While technically competent people might go:
"Oh neat, I don't even need to install an app, if I just put the website icon onto my home screen."
Most users are like: "Oh my god noooo! Not another way to do something! Aaaaa I cannot cope!" and panic.
You come off like a dick, but it's really true.
I saw a tweet where some Zoomer was roasting an "Elder Millenial" for switching devices from a mobile phone to a desktop when making a big purchase (airline tickets? I forget).
I didn't feel like wading into that argument (what's the point? like spitting in a campfire), but... yeah.
Some folks say that we are regressing wrt technological proficiency, but it's really just that more people use technology than they used to. Regression to the mean, maybe? Is that the right expression?
Fair warning, what will write only applies to my circumstance and I have no intention to denigrate the life experiences of others.
I used to prescribe myself labels like ADHD. In fact I probably got into this habit at a very young age since people around me were already talking about labels and how they did or didn't apply to me, and I soaked all this up as children are wont to do.
I no longer abide by such labels anymore and still live comfortably. I discovered that what I called "ADHD" and motivated me to get on the Ritalin/TODO list/5-alarms-a-day train was my method of relieving myself from stress. Distracting myself was my way of coping with stress I found impossible to deal with or even approach at a lower level.
And historically, I had experienced the consequences of not distracting myself firsthand. In the past, when I forced myself take breaks and do literally nothing for a week at a time, I was stressed for what seemed like no reason for every waking hour. The stress would only be relieved when I went back to distracting myself with something (on my computer, at work, etc.). The difference was I was previously unable to recognize the cause of this stress and this address it effectively.
When I was able to address the underlying cause of stress (and this lurked in the background for years or even decades and would not have appeared consciously without heavy-duty and sustained focus), my desire for Facebook-Twitter-HN disappeared overnight. So did my stimulant prescription.
With that, the label "ADHD" disappeared as well. I called myself that a lot over the years. It turns out I was just fighting myself the whole time for seeing myself as "too weak" to deal with being unable to sustain "attention", and targeting my distraction as if it were the ultimate cause, not the symptom it really was. The stress was the real problem, and it remained latent for years without me so much as thinking of it.
On top of being distracted all the time from stress, my belief was if I couldn't stick to a stringent schedule with every minute detail mapped out for each day, I was a failure. Because my impression was that that's the standard you needed to set for yourself to address "ADHD", and if you weren't putting in your reps, your condition would dominate you and you'd live a miserable existence... which made miserable, which only made me believe more strongly in this narrative, and so on in an endless spiral.
I should mention everyone around me also believed in the "disease model" of psychology, so they only served to reinforce these beliefs. I think I renounced this model a bit too strongly in hindsight, as a few of my relationships have been left permanently altered as a result.
Now I don't bother to follow a strict schedule except for work things. I clean my place on Sunday. That's my only real obligation I've set for myself. Things that "need to be" done somehow get done automatically - because I don't need to pressure myself into doing them, I just want to, and they don't take much time. I no longer feel the need to sweat any of those details or micromanage my own life anymore, and instead just take life as it comes.
It shouldn't come as a surprise that I've never been happier with myself living this way.
Interesting. If it's not too personal, would you mind sharing what the "cause" turned out to be, and how you were able to discover it?
ant_li0n commented on Ozempic is causing trouble on Savile Row thetimes.com/life-style/l... · Posted by u/cwwc
I assumed if I kept reading there would be a line explaining why they can't simply raise prices until the demand becomes manageable with current staffing, such as "We sold all these suits with guaranteed adjustments for £[some heavily discounted number] for life", but I didn't find any such explanation. Shrug
I think the population of people buying bespoke suiting is small enough that you would not want to alienate your existing customers. I agree that they should raise the prices, but I've got to think there's an aspect of a relationship there. It was hinted at, a little bit, in the article. It's not just a financial transaction, I mean.
ant_li0n commented on Ozempic is causing trouble on Savile Row thetimes.com/life-style/l... · Posted by u/cwwc
This is horrible. The worst thing that can happen to a business - more and more customers are coming every day! How will these people survive!
You can assume they'd rather be constructing new clothes, rather than doing alterations. You can also assume that there is some amount of their previous customer base who aren't interested in restarting the process at 0 with creating custom patterns, etc.
It's quite possible that the lasting effects are more dramatic, as this plays out over time and we move increasingly towards casual dress.
ant_li0n commented on The Aging Programmer [video] youtube.com/watch?v=mVWQQ... · Posted by u/belter
The host is clearly in poor physical condition and many of their concerns are due to lack of proper nutrition , exercise and prescription meds abuse. They appear 15 years older than they should be. Their advice is primarily reactive, and the trivial proactive advice (exercise more) is delivered almost ironically.
Take care of yourself now. Drop the weight, get generous activity, get off the meds and you will feel loads better.
Fifteen years older?! You think that woman looks 78? To me I'd put her in her mid-60s. She's 63. She looks like a 63 year old.
I think part of the problem of this talk is that it introduces the fact that older people/people with disabilities are judged on their appearances instead of their capabilities (which, with respect, you have just demonstrated). Then the talk sortof goes off into a "how to age gracefully" direction and abandons that original line of thinking (disclaimer, I only watched the first 30 minutes so far).
I definitely would be interested in addressing the first issue because, as they say, everyone becomes a old and/or disabled (unless like Tom Petty, you're dead).
ant_li0n commented on Private Cloud Compute Security Guide security.apple.com/docume... · Posted by u/djoldman
If Apple controls the root of trust, like the private keys in the CPU or security processor used to check the enclave (similar to how Intel and AMD do it with SEV-SNP and TDX), then technically, it's a "trust us" situation, since they likely use their own ARM silicon for that?
Harder to attack, sure, but no outside validation. Apple's not saying "we can't access your data," just "we're making it way harder for bad guys (and rogue employees) to get at it."
Hey can you help me understand what you mean? There's an entry about "Hardware Root of Trust" in that document, but I don't see how that means Apple is avoiding stating, "we can't access your data" - the doc says it's not exportable.
"Explain it like I'm a lowly web dev"
ant_li0n commented on AI is an impediment to learning web development ben.page/jumbocode-ai... · Posted by u/bdlowery
I’ve come to the same conclusion in regards to my own learning, even after 15 years doing this.
When I want a quick hint for something I understand the gist of, but don’t know the specifics, I really like AI. It shortens the trip to google, more or less.
When I want a cursory explanation of some low level concept I want to understand better, I find it helpful to get pushed in various directions by the AI. Again, this is mostly replacing google, though it’s slightly better.
AI is a great rubber duck at times too. I like being able to bounce ideas around and see code samples in a sort of evolving discussion. Yet AI starts to show its weaknesses here, even as context windows and model quality has evidently ballooned. This is where real value would exist for me, but progress seems slowest.
When I get an AI to straight up generate code for me I can’t help but be afraid of it. If I knew less I think I’d mostly be excited that working code is materializing out of the ether, but my experience so far has been that this code is not what it appears to be.
The author’s description of ‘dissonant’ code is very apt. This code never quite fits its purpose or context. It’s always slightly off the mark. Some of it is totally wrong or comes with crazy bugs, missed edge cases, etc.
Sure, you can fix this, but this feels a bit too much like using the wrong too for the job and then correcting it after the fact. Worse still is that in the context of learning, you’re getting all kinds of false positive signals all the time that X or Y works (the code ran!!), when in reality it’s terrible practice or not actually working for the right reasons or doing what you think it does.
The silver lining of LLMs and education (for me) is that they demonstrated something to me about how I learn and what I need to do to learn better. Ironically, this does not rely on LLMs at all, but almost the opposite.
I feel like using copilot chat in my editor has really been a boost for me, in the way you describe. But it's also super janky. Like lots of times I'll be having a conversation about my code, and then I say, "what if I were to make this change here" and it comes back, "Sorry, I don't have access to your files. Can you paste the code in?" And I'm like, WE WERE JUST TALKING ABOUT IT. It's like the file fell out of context, but it didn't tell me. Sometimes it's hard to get the current file back in context.
Or I'll go to great pains to be explicit about what I want (no code snippets unless I ask for them specifically, responses hundreds of lines long with dozens of steps it wants me to take), and for a little while it does that, and then boom, back to barfing out code snippets.
People talk about this tool as some kind of miracle worker and to me while it is helpful it is also a source of major frustration for me, because it cannot do these most basic things. When I hear about people talking about how amazing LLMs are, I'm extremely confused. What am I doing wrong? I really would like to know.
This logic is fundamentally flawed. Pointing this out to people (often in strong language) makes them defensive. This creates the perfect combination to get people to vote against their best interests.
It's not about "being progressive" or "elite". It's about playing to the fears of people who are already fearful.